SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 232

H.R.KHANNA, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Sethu Madhavan Nair – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Judgement

KHANNA, J.:- Sethu Madhavan Nair and 12 others were tried in the court of the learned Sessions Judge Palghat for offences under Section 148 and 302 or in the alternative under Section 302 read with Section 148 Indian Penal Code and were acquitted. On appeal by the State, the Kerala High Court reversed the judgment of acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 302 read with Sec.149 Indian Penal Code and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life. The 13 accused thereafter filed the present appeal against the judgment of the High Court.

2. Ananthakrishnan deceased was a landowner of village Thannisseri. He was also Secretary of the Karshaks Samajam, an organization of landowners. The accused are workers of the local Marxist Communist Party. About one or two months before the present occurrence, an agitation had been started by Karshaka Thozhilali Union, which was faailiated to the Marxist Communist Party, for the enhancement of wages payable to agricultural labourers. As a result of that agitation, the landowners found difficulty in conducting their agricultural operations. The relations between the landowners and the Marxist Communist Party consequently b
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top