SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 108

M.H.BEG, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Hallu – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.MUKHERJI, H.S.PARIHAR, I.M.SHROFF, PANJVANI, S.Baggar, S.K.Bagga, Yash Bagga

Judgement

CHANDRACHUD, J.:- Eighteen persons were put up for trial before the First Additional Session Judge, Durg (M. P.) for offences arising out of the murder of two persons Jagdeo and Padum. The learned Judge acquitted them of all the charges but that order was partly set aside by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh which confirmed the acquittal of eight persons and convicted the remaining ten under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Penal Code. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court under which a sentence of life imprisonment has been imposed of the appellants.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the afternoon of May 9, 1966, a group of about 18 persons including the appellants dragged Jagdeo and Padum from their houses and attacked them with lathis, spears and axes. In 1965 Jugdeo and Padum were prosecuted along with 2 others for committing the murder of one Daulatram, the Sarpanch of the village. That case ended in acquittal and it is alleged that Judgeo and Padum were done to death by the appellants who felt especially aggrieved by the murder of the Sarpanch.

3. Since the High Court has set aside the order of acquittal passed b












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top