SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(SC) 465

I.D.DUA, K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Assam – Appellant
Versus
Himangshu Sekhar Chakarvarty – Respondent


Judgment

HEGDE, J.:- This is an appeal special leave. It is directed against the decision of the High Court of Assam and Nagaland rejecting the Commissioner s application under Section 66 (2) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922.

2. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the assessments made on him on the ground that the assessee, which is an association of persons, had not made any illegal profits, but the illegal profits were made by two of the three members of that association. Aggrieved by that decision, the Commissioner requested the Tribunal to submit to the High Court for its opinion three questions of law, namely :

"(1) Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case the assessment dated 22-10-62 for the year 1945-46 was validly made in consequence of or to give effect to any finding or direction contained in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal s orders dated 10-11-60 u/s 34 (3) proviso 2 of the Income Tax Act, 1922 and as such the assessment in question was not barred by limitation ?

(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the assessment dated 22-10-62 was rightly made under the provisions of S. 44 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top