N.L.UNTWALIA, K.K.MATHEW
Joginder Nath – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
UNTWALIA, J. :- The four petitioners in this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India are working as Additional District and Sessions Judges in the Delhi Higher Judicial Service at Delhi. Their prayers in this writ petition are to strike down Rules 9 (a) and 11 of the Delhi Judicial Service Rules, 1970 as being ultra vires and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution and to declare Rule 8 of Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 as void and unconstitutional. Their further prayer is to quash the fixation of the seniority of the petitioners and respondents 3 to 6 and to place petitioners 1 to 4 above respondents 3 to 5 and petitioners 2 to 4 above respondent 6 in the gradation of seniority in Delhi Judicial Service and Delhi Higher Judicial Service.
2. All the four petitioners originally belonged to the Punjab Civil Service Judicial). Shri Joginder Nath, petitioner No. 1 joined the said service on 2-7-1956, Shri D. C Aggarwal, petitioner No. 2 on 2-7-1957, Shri S. R. Goel, petitioner No. 3 on 8-7-1957, and Shri P. L. Singla, petitioner No. 4 on 10-10-l958. Prior to 1966, the Union Territory of Delhi for the purposes of administration of justice was
Chandramouleshwar Prasad v. Patna High court
relied on : Chandra Mailan v. State of U. P.
distinguished : Kunnathat Thatunii Mooopil Nair v. State of Kerala
followed : Parshotam Lal Dhingra v. Union of India
Robindra Math Dom v. Union of India
referred to : Ruakchand Motuhandv. H. B. Munshi
Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar v. State of Maharashtra
relied on : State of Gujarat v. Shri Ambica Alilts Ltd., Ahmedabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.