SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 43

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.R. KHANNA, P.N. BHAGWATI AND R.S. SARKARIA, JJ.
Gangadhar Yeshwant Bhandare, Appellant
Versus
Erasmo De Jesus Sequiria, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 991 of 1973,
D/4-2-1975.
Advocates appeared
M/s. V. R. Bhandare, V. N. Ganpule and Mrs. Urmila Sirur, Advocates, for Appellant; Mr. A. K. Sen, Senior Advocate, (Mr. S. R. Agarwala, Advocate, with him), for Respondent.

Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, S.R.AGARWAL, URMILA SIM, V.M.GANPULE, V.R.BHANDARE

Headnote:

Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Citizenship Act, 1955 - Section 7 - Daman and Diu (Citizenship) Order, 1962 – Election - Portuguese Administration - Whether said respondent at relevant time was a citizen of India - Respondent was declared elected to Lok Sabha from parliamentary constituency in elections held - Appellant who had been validly nominated as a candidate at election for above constituency withdrew his candidature and did not contest said election - After result of election had been declared appellant filed election petition to have election of respondent declared void on ground that on election respondent was not qualified to be chosen to fill a parliamentary seat under Constitution of India and Representation of People Act 1951 as respondent on that date was not a citizen of India and not an elector as contemplated by Representation of People Act 1951- According to appellant prior to when Union Territory of Goa Daman & Diu was liberated from Portuguese domination and became a part of Indian Union said territory was a Portuguese possession and respondent was a Portuguese citizen - Held, Central Government with power to certify in case a doubt exists as to whether a particular person is a citizen of India that he is such a citizen - In case of respondent a doubt was raised by Government of Goa Daman and Diu on point as to whether he was a citizen of India - Government of Goa Daman and Diu in this context referred to fact that respondent while praying on for being declared Indian citizen had suppressed fact about his having signed declaration P3 on choosing to retain Portuguese nationality - Central Government even after being apprised of that fact refused to reconsider its decision of and observed that matter should be treated as closed - When respondent thereafter asked for certificate under Section 13 Central Government said that no such certificate was necessary in view o earlier official communication which had been sent to him that he had prima facie become a citizen of India - Appeal dismissed

Judgment

KHANNA, J.: - The short question which arises for determination in this appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Commissioner Goa, Daman and Diu dismissing petition filed by Gangadhar Yeshwant Bhandare appellant to question the election of Erasmo De Jesus Sequiria respondent to the Lok Sabha is whether the said respondent at the relevant time was a citizen of India.

2. The respondent was declared elected to the Lok Sabha from the Mormugao parliamentary constituency in the elections held in March 1971. The appellant who had been validly nominated as a candidate at the election for the above constituency withdrew his candidature and did not contest the said election. After the result of the election had been declared, the appellant filed election petition to have the election of the respondent declared void on the ground that on the date of the election the respondent was not qualified to be chosen to fill a parliamentary seat under the Constitution of India and the Representation of the People Act, 1951 as the respondent on that date was not a citizen of India and not an elector as contemplated by the Representation of the People Act, 1951. According to the appellant, prior to December 20, 1961 when the Union Territory of Goa, Daman & Diu was liberated from the Portuguese domination and became a part of the Indian Union the said territory was a Portuguese possession and the respondent was a Portuguese citizen. Following the liberation and merger of that territory with the Union of India, the Government of India in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 7 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 issued on March 28, 1962 Goa, Daman and Diu (Citizenship) Order, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as Citizenship Order) conferring the citizenship of India on persons born in the above mentioned territory before December 20, 1961 on the terms and conditions set out in the order. The relevant part of clause 2 of that order was as under :

"Every person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grand parents was born before the twentieth day of December 1961 in the Territories now comprised in the Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu shall be deemed to have become a citizen of India on that day :

Provided that any such person shall not be deemed to have become a citizen of India as aforesaid if within one month from the date of publication of this Order in the Official gazette that person makes a declaration in writing to the Administrator of Goa, Daman and Diu or any other authority specified by him in this behalf that he chooses to retain the citizenship or nationality which he had immediately before the twentieth day of December, 1961;"

It is stated that the respondent chose to maintain his Portuguese nationality and citizenship by making a declaration in writing dated April 27, 1962 as required by the above clause. The respondent thereafter proceeded on foreign travel as an alien on the basis of a Portuguese passport issued to him on or about June 25, 1958 by the former Portuguese Administration. As the said passport was due to expire on June 21, 1962 the respondent on arrival in London in June 1962 applied to the Portuguese Consul in London for a new Portuguese passport which was granted to him on June 18, 1962. The new passport was valid up to June 17, 1964. The respondent returned to India in October 1962 and as an alien applied for and obtained residential permit in India. The permit was renewed from time to time.

3. On December 20, 1962 the Central Government published the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 1962 and, inserted in Schedule III to the Citizenship Rules, 1956 clause 3A which reads as under:

"3-A. Where a person, who has become an Indian citizen by virtue of the Goa, Daman and Diu (Citizenship) Order, 1962, or the Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Citizenship) Order, 1962, issued under Section 7 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (57 of 1955), holds a passport issued by the Government of any other country, the fact that he has not surrend

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top