SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. RAY, C.J.I., P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY, H.R. KHANNA AND P.K. GOSWAMI, JJ.
The Anant Mills Co. Ltd., etc, etc. ( In civil Appeals Nos.752-755 of 1973); The Aryodaya spg. and Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. ( In Civil Appeals Nos. 489-513 of 1973); The Municipal Corpn. of City of Ahmedabad and others (In Civil Appeals Nos. 643-684 of 1973): The state of Gujarat (In Civil Appeals Nos, 389-430 of 1974, Appellants
Versus
The State of Gujarat (In Civil Appeals Nos. 752-755 and 489-513 of 1973): The Anant Mills Co. Ltd. and others ( In Civil Appea1s Nos. 643-684 of 1973) The Municipal Corpn. of the City of Ahmedabad and others etc. etc. (In Civil Appeals Nos. 389-430 of 1974) Respondents.
Writ Petns. Nos. 51, 60 to 74, 87 to 91, 157, 492 to 503, 533-534 and 583 of 1972, 1866 to 1877 and 2046 of 1973, D/- 21-1- 1975.
AND
The Aryodaya Spg. and Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. etc. etc., Petitioners
Versus
The Municipal Corpn. of the City of Ahmedabad and others Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 752 to 755, 489 to 513, 643 to 684 of 1973 and 389 to 430 of 1974.
Writ Petns. Nos. 51, 60 to 74, 87 to 91, 157, 492 to 503, 533-534 and 583 of 1972, 1866 to 1877 and 2046 of 1973, D/- 21-1- 1975.
Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act - Taxation Rules - Rule 7 - Corporations Act - Amending Act - Section 152-A – Constitution of India,1950 – Articles 14 and 32 - A separate section of assessment book was prepared by commissioner of Corporation for each official year in respect of assessment of property tax on certain kinds of properties like textile mills factories and buildings of University - These properties were classified as special properties - Ratable value of properties included in Special property Section was previously determined on a flat rate for every of floor area - There was some increase in rateable value fixed by Commissioner for years - Commissioner also made initial entries in assessment book in respect of those properties for year - A number of writ petitions under Article 32 of Constitution were filed in this Court challenging validity of assessments for years as well as initial entries for year – Held, Petitioner electricity company may be held to be actual occupier of underground space on which its supply line has been laid petitioner company does not hold said space from Corporation - It is urged that petitioner company is in occupation of that space under a statute and not from Corporation - In order to hold that space from Corporation it was essential according to learned counsel that there should have been some agreement between petitioner-company and Corporation or that Corporation should have given its consent for that purpose - Court are unable to accede to above submission - Clause (a) of Section 139 (1) of Corporations Act fastens liability for payment of property tax on actual occupier of premises held immediately from Government or from Corporation – Order Accordingly
Judgment
KHANNA, J. :- questions relating to the constitutional validity of the different provisions of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act (Bombay Act 59 of 1949) (hereinafter referred to as the Corporations Act) as amended by Gujarat Acts No. 8 of 1968 and No. 5 of 1970 arise for determination in these appeals and the connected writ petitions. The Corporations Act was enacted by the Bombay legislature in December 1949 for the establishment of municipal corporations in the cities of Ahmedabad and Poona. It was applied to Ahmedabad on July 1, 1950.
2. The assessment of properties to property tax in Ahmedabad was made under the corporations Act by making entries in the assessment books in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the Taxation Rules set out in chapter Vlll .of Schedule A of the corporations Act A separate section of the assessment book was prepared by the commissioner of the Corporation for each official year in respect of the assessment of property tax on certain kinds of properties like textile mills, factories and buildings of University. These properties were classified as special properties. The ratable value of properties included in the Special property Section was previously determined on a flat rate for every 100 sq. ft. of the floor area. In arriving at the figure of the ratable value, the plants and machinery situate upon lands and buildings were also taken into account as provided in clauses (2) and (3) of Rule 7 of the Taxation Rules. There was some increase in the rateable value fixed by the Commissioner for the years 1964-65 and 1965-66. The commissioner also made initial entries in assessment book in respect of those properties for the year 1966-67. A number of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were filed in this Court challenging the validity of the assessments for the years 1964-65 and 1965-66 as well as the initial entries for the year 1966-67. Those writ petitions were disposed of by this court by a judgment delivered on February 21, 1967 and reported as New Manek chowk SPg. and Wvg. Mills co. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad. (1967) 2 SCR 679 . This court allowed the writ petitions and held the relevant entries in the assessment books to be invalid, it was held in that case that the State Legislature had no competence under Entry 49 of the State List in the Seventh Schedule to the constitution to make a law for taxing machinery . Rule 7 (2) was held to be beyond the legislative competence of the State. Rules 7 (2) and (3) were also held to be invalid on account of excessive delegation of powers by the legislature under those rules the specification of the classes of machinery for the purpose of taxation was to be made by the commissioner with the approval of the corporation irrespective of the question as to where they were to be found. This court found that it depended upon the arbitrary will of the commissioner as to what machinery he would specify and what he would not and that he was the only person who could examine this question as there was no right of appeal. Dealing with the method of levy of tax on the basis of floor area, this Court observed that it was against the provisions of the Act and the rules made thereunder and that it had not been shown that conditions prerequisite for determination of the annual value on that basis had existed at the relevant time. The above method of taxation on the basis of floor area, it was held, was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution as it would in the absence of classification of factories on any rational basis give rise to inequalities,
3. Although the SC directed the Corporation to prepare fresh assessment lists relating to properties in the Special property Section for the official years 1964-65, 1965-66 and 1966-67, the Corporation was unable to do so in view of the decision of the High Court in the case of Ahmedabad Municipality v. Keshavlal, (1965) 6 Guj LR 238 wherein it was held
followed : Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh v. State of V. P.
relied on : Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
Hathising Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Corpn. of Calcutta v. Padma Debi
Khandige Sham Bhat v. Agrl. I. T. O., Kasaragod
Municipal Corpn. of the City of Ahmedabad v. New Shrock Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.