SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND N.L. UNTWALIA, JJ.
Gopinath Pramanik, Petitioner
Versus
The District Magistrate, Nadia and others, Respondents.
Writ Petition No.556 of 1974, D/-18-3-1975
Petitioner Challenging Detention Order - Petitioner detenu has moved this petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus challenging his detention on ground, inter alia, that the order of the District Magistrate is based on activities prejudicial to maintenance of public order while grounds relied on have relevance only to maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community – Held, Court examined case and find that grounds relied on by District Magistrate are germane to disruption of maintenance of supplies and services essential to community and have nothing to do whatsoever with the maintenance of public order - Detenu in his application has specifically stated that grounds of detention have no nexus with maintenance of public order - In answer, counter-affidavit filed by State does not specifically deny this infirmity - It follows that detention is unsustainable on this simple ground of non-denial of no nexus between grounds and order without probing further into the matter - We therefore direct release of the detenu - Petition allowed.
Judgment
KRISHNA IYER, J.:- The petitioner detenu has moved this petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus challenging his detention on the ground, inter alia, that the order of the District Magistrate is based on activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order while the grounds relied on have relevance only to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community. We have examined the case and find that the grounds relied on by the District Magistrate are germane to disruption of maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community and have nothing to do whatsoever with the maintenance of public order.
2. The detenu in his application has specifically stated that the grounds of detention have no nexus with the maintenance of public order. In answer, the counter-affidavit filed by the State does not specifically deny this infirmity. It follows that the detention is unsustainable on this simple ground of non-denial of no nexus between the grounds and order without probing further into the matter. We therefore direct release of the detenu.
Petition allowed.
For Citation : AIR 1975 SC 1406
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.