SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 125

N.L.UNTWALIA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Gopinath Pramanik – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate, Nadia – Respondent


Judgment

KRISHNA IYER, J.:- The petitioner detenu has moved this petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus challenging his detention on the ground, inter alia, that the order of the District Magistrate is based on activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order while the grounds relied on have relevance only to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community. We have examined the case and find that the grounds relied on by the District Magistrate are germane to disruption of maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community and have nothing to do whatsoever with the maintenance of public order.

2. The detenu in his application has specifically stated that the grounds of detention have no nexus with the maintenance of public order. In answer, the counter-affidavit filed by the State does not specifically deny this infirmity. It follows that the detention is unsustainable on this simple ground of non-denial of no nexus between the grounds and order without probing further into the matter. We therefore direct release of the detenu.

Petition allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1975 SC 1406

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top