SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 275

A.C.GUPTA, H.R.KHANNA, M.H.BEG
Collector Of Kamrup – Appellant
Versus
Raj Chandra Sarma: Surendra Nath Sarma – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, LALITA KOHLI, Navnit Lal, P.S.NARASIMHA, Suresh Sethi, T.C.Dass

Judgement

GUPTA, J.: These two appeals on certificate of fitness granted by the High Court of Assam and Nagaland under Article 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution arise out of land acquisition proceedings. A large area of land in village Cotanagar. Mouza Ramcharani was acquired for the Railways in 1950. The extent of the land acquired in the case of the first respondent in Civil Appeal No. 178 of 1968 Raj Chandra Sarma, was 11 bighas, 4 kathas and 10 lachhas of rupit (cultivable) land, and in the case of Surendra Nath Sarma, sole respondent in Civil Appeal No. 179 of 1968,67 bighas 1 katha and 10 lachhas of which 60 bighas were rupit land, and 7 bighas 1 kaths and 16 lachhas were basti land. The Collector awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 350/- per bigha for rupit land and Rs. 300/- per bigha for basti land. Being dissatisfied the claimants applied for reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The Subordinate Judge who heard the reference felt that on the material before him the only possible way to assess the value of the land was by capitalising the income from the land for 25 years. He referred to an application (Ext. A) made to the Collector by one of the c








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top