A.C.GUPTA, R.S.SARKARIA, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Madurai District Central Co Operative Bank – Appellant
Versus
Third Income Tax Officer, Madurai – Respondent
Judgement
Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, J.:- The appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court of Madras under Article 226 of the Constitution to challenge an assessment order dated August 22, 1963 made by the respondent levying additional surcharge on its residual income. The High Court dismissed the writ petition by its judgment dated October 15, 1968 but it has granted to the appellant a certificate to file an appeal to this Court under Article 133 (1) (a) and (c) of the Constitution.
2. The appellant is a co-operative society engaged in the business of banking. Its total income for the assessment year 1963-64 was computed by the respondent at Rupees 10,00,098. Out of this, Rs. 9.48.335 was its business income while Rupees 51.763 was its income from other sources. Since, under Section 81 (i) (a)of the Income-tax Act, 1961 a cooperative society engaged in the business of banking is not liable to pay lncome-tax on its business income, the tax amounting to Rs. 23,845.47 was charged on Rs.51,763 only though for the purposes of rate the income was taken at Rs. 9,48.335 in view of Section 110 of the Act Applying the Finance Act, XIII of 1963, the respondent computed the residual income of the
referred to : McCregor and Balfour Ltd., Calcutta v. C. I. T.
distinguished : United Commrl. Bank Ltd. v. C. I. T., West Bengal
McGregor and Balfour Ltd. v. C. I. T.
relied on : McCregar and Balfour Ltd. v. C.I. T., West Bengal
Hari Krishna Bhargav v. Union of India
relied on : Keswam lndustries and Cotton Mills Ltd. v.Cammr. for Wealth Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.