SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 290

K.K.MATHEW, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD, A.N.RAY
Howrah Insurance Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Sochindra Mohan Das Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
D.N.MUKHERJI, G.S.CHATTERJEE, P.K.CHATTERJI, RATHIN DAS, S.V.Gupta

Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, J. - By a deed of mortgage dated February 10, 1943 the respondent mortgaged a tea garden called the "Ishanchandrapur Tea Estate" to M/ s. Das Bank Ltd. On January 19, 1950 the Bank instituted Mortgage Suit No. 2 /1950 against the respondent on the Original Side of the Tripura High Court, for recovering the amount due under the mortgage. On reorganisation of the Judicial Administration in Tripura, the suit was transferred to the court of the District Judge, Agartala. On January 20, 1950 the Bank applied for the appointment of a Receiver. On the District Judge directing that the Bank should nominate a Receiver in terms of clause 12 of the mortgage deed, first the Secretary of the Bank and later another employee called Adhir Rangan Dutta was appointed as the Receiver subject of his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 50,000. The Receiver took possession of the estate on 22nd January but since the security was not furnished, the court directed on an application of the respondent that the Receiver should furnish the requisite security within the time allowed to him. On February 26, 1950 the tea garden was damaged by a fire which destroyed over 3,000 tea saplings.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top