SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 416

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. SARKARIA AND A.C. GUPTA, JJ
Labh Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 176 of 1971
Decided on l0-10-1975
Advocates appeared
M/s. Hardev Singh and R. S.Sodhi, Advocates. for Appellants; Mr.O. P. Sharma and Mr. Balak Ram, Advocates for Respondent.

Advocates:
Balak Ram, HARDEV SINGH, O.P.Sharma, R.S.SODHI

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 – Sections 307/326/149 – Acquitted - Appeal Against Conviction - All of them were acquitted – Counts and sentenced them to imprisonment for life – Prosecution story as adumbrated – First Information Report – Cause of fight is that about one and a half months back, Labh Singh had damaged our gowara crop by letting in bullocks. An altercation had also taken place with Sadhu Singh who had come to Manuali on duty – So abuses were also exchanged many times but the Panchayat used to pacify the matter in the village – They have belaboured my father and Sadhu the latter due to the grudge that he has been helping my father. All the accused have inflicted injuries with their common intention – My maternal uncle, Nasib Singh, and Gurdev Singh, resident of Manuali have taken Sadhu Singh and my father to the Hospital at Chandigarh, for treatment – Court along with Mihan Singh aforesaid have come to lodge the report – Action may be taken –Held, High Court has correctly interpreted that by saying that Sadhu Singh was semi-conscious but at the same time he was conscious enough to make the statement he did, what these unsophisticated villagers meant was that Sadhu Singh was not fit enough to make an elaborate statement – There is nothing in the statements of these witnesses to show that Nasib Singh at the time of making statement PU/I. was not fully conscious – Very brevity and rugged simplicity of these statements is a guarantee of their genuineness – Had these documents been prepared after the arrival of the Police Officer, they would not have been so cryptic – Nor could they have been written in this form – It may be noted that in Ex. PU/I, Nasib Singh stated that he had been assaulted by five persons brother-in-law of and an unknown person. Similarly in Ex.PW, Sadhu Singh stated that one of his assailant was an unknown person – In the First Information, Gurdev Singh has named this unknown person as Sital Singh alias Surjit Singh of Saheran – Circumstance indicates two things – First, that these statements were made without prompting or tutoring by Gurdev Singh, or anybody else, and possibly they were made after had gone to arrange for conveyance to remove the injured to the Hospital – Secondly, they were not written after the registration of the case in the Police Station or during investigation – Dying declarations were handed over by the Sarpanch to the Investigating Officer when he reached the spot on the following morning – Up to that time, he kept these documents in his safe custody – These village dignitaries were wholly disinterested persons – They were not related to the victims or the appellants – They had no axe of their own to grind against the appellants – There was absolutely no ground to disbelieve their sworn word – Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

SARKARIA J.:— Labh Singh, Jamiat Singh, Banta Singh, Surjit Singh and Harbans Kaur of village Manauli were tried for the murders of Nasib Singh and Sadhu Singh by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala. All of them were acquitted. The State carried an appeal against that acquittal to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The High Court set aside the acquittal of Labh Singh, Jamiat Singh and Banta Singh and convicted them under Sec. 302 read with S. 34, Penal Code on two counts and sentenced them to imprisonment for life, each. In addition, a fine of Rs. 200/- was imposed on each of the convicts.

2. Aggrieved by that order, Labh Singh, Jamiat Singh and Banta Singh have come in appeal to this Court.

3. The prosecution story as adumbrated in the F.I.R., Ex. P.A., lodged by Gurdev Singh, PW 5, at the Police Station, Mubarakpur, on October 13, 1968 at 3.50 P.M. was as follows:

"I am a resident of village Manauli. Today, at 8/9 A.M. I along with my father, Nasib Singh and my sister s husband, Sadhu Singh son of Assa Singh, Jat, by caste, resident of Bandey Mahla Khurd, were scraping Khal (channel) to bring water from the tubewell of Teja Singh of Kailria, now residing at Manauli. Labh Singh and his companions came running from his maize field: and Labh Singh son of Ram Dass resident of aforesaid village, gave a gandasi blow from its sharp side on the head of Sadhu Singh, who ran away. Jamiat Singh son of Ram Dass gave a bircha blow from the back, on his shoulder blades. Banta Singh, brother-in-law (wife s brother) of Labh Singh, resident of Sahoran, gave a kohala blow from its sharp side on the right leg of Sadhu Singh, who fell down in the maize field of Gurdev Singh, resident of Manauli. Thereon, Harbans Kaur wife of Labh Singh hurled a kirpan blow towards my father which he warded off with his hands, and the hands were injured. Sital, resident of Sahoran, gave a Safajang blow from the right side on the head of my father, who also fell down. Both the aforesaid accused inflicted 85 injuries with their respective weapons upon Sadhu Singh and my father when they were lying on the ground. Ram Dass father of Labh Singh kept on raising lalkaras that Sadhu Singh and Nasib should not be left alive. My mother, Mihar Singh jat of village Sahoran and Nasib Singh Jat resident of Khuda, had also reached the spot. On the alarm raised by all of us, the accused ran away. Thereafter I collected Panchayat of the village and showed them the spot. The cause of fight is that about one and a half months back, Labh Singh had damaged our gowara crop by letting in bullocks. An altercation had also taken place with Sadhu Singh who had come to Manuali on duty. So abuses were also exchanged many times but the Panchayat used to pacify the matter in the village. They have belaboured my father and Sadhu the latter due to the grudge that he has been helping my father. All the accused have inflicted injuries with their common intention. My maternal uncle, Nasib Singh, and Gurdev Singh, resident of Manuali have taken Sadhu Singh and my father to the Hospital at Chandigarh, for treatment. I along with Mihan Singh aforesaid have come to lodge the report. Action may be taken."

4. On this report, Station Officer Gurnam Singh (P. W. 22) registered a case under Secs. 307/326/149, Penal Code. Accompanied by Head Constable Santokh, 4 constables, Gurdev Singh P.W.5 and Mihan Singh, PW 9, he then reached the Bus Stand at Chandigarh. From there, he sent the Head Constable to the scene of occurrence, while he along with the PWS, reached the Hospital in Sector l6 at 6.30 P.M. He found Sadhu Singh dead, and Nasib Singh unfit to make a statement. He then recorded the statement of Mihan Singh there in the Hospital. Nasib Singh also died in the Hospital the same night. He prepared the inquest reports regarding the deaths of Sadhu Singh and Nasib Singh. On the following day, the 14th October, he visited the scene of occurrence in the presence of PWS Sardari Lal Sarpanc


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top