SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 418

A.ALAGIRISWAMI, N.L.UNTWALIA, P.K.GOSWAMI
Bharat Iron Works – Appellant
Versus
Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
AMBRISH KUMAR, B.C.SHAH, M.C.BHANDARE, M.V.GOSWAMY, S.Bhandan

JUDGMENT

P. K. GOSWAMI, J.:— In a long line of decisions of this Court the ambit of Section 33, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is now well established. There is also no difference in principle of the law applicable to a case under Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act and that under Section 33. To put it clearly, it is this :

When an application under Section 33 whether for approval or for permission is made to a Tribunal it has initially a limited jurisdiction only to see whether a prima facie case is made out in respect of the misconduct charged. This is, however, the position only when the domestic enquiry preceding the order of dismissal is free from any defect, that is to say, free from the vice of violation of the principals of natural justice. If on the other hand, there is violation of the principles of natural justice, the Tribunal will then give opportunity to the employer to produce evidence, if any, and also to the workman to rebut it if he so chooses. In the latter event the Tribunal will be entitled to arrive at its own conclusion on merits on the evidence produced before it with regard to the proof of the misconduct charged, and the Tribunal then, will not be confined







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top