SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 378

A.C.GUPTA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Commissioner Of Expenditure Tax, A. P. – Appellant
Versus
P. V. G. Raju, Rajah Of Vizianagaram – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.Velayudhan Nair, P.RAM REDDY, R.M.MEHTA, S.P.NAIR


JUDGMENT

KRISHNA IYER, J.:—

Keynote thought

Politics and philanthropy may well fall victim to the construction of Sec. 5(a). and (j) of the Expenditure Tax Act, 1957 (the Act, for short) if we fall victim to the submission naively made, at the first stage, by counsel for the State. In fairness to him, we must state that later he retracted from that position, and rightly so, for the Act, in spirit and letter, does not intend this blow on the profession of politics or the disposition for donations.

2. A fair reading of the provisions in question convincingly excludes from taxable expenditure sums wholly and exclusively incurred for the purpose of a profession or occupation carried on by the assessee and no modern man may dispute that politics is a profession or occupation. Likewise, expenditure by way of gift or donation incurred by the assessee is also excluded and no politically conscious soul will deny that donation to a party in a democracy squarely comes within this exclusionary provision. 141

The factual matrix

3. Expenditure tax under the Act was sought to be levied from the assessee PVG Raju, the respondent before us. Paradoxical, perhaps it may appear - but here is a case of
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top