SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 437

M.H.BEG, P.K.GOSWAMI
Mangu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.L.JITGAR, E.C.AGARWAL, S.M.Jain

JUDGMENT

GOSWAMI, J.:— The two appellants along with four others were convicted by the Session Judge, Bhilwara, under Sections 147, 452/149 and 325/149, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment and fine. The High Court on appeal acquitted four of them and maintained the conviction and sentence of the two appellants who were involved with several others. The appellants moved an application for a certificate praying for leave to appeal to this Court under Article 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution. Later on the leave application was withdrawn and on May12, 1971, the High Court rejected the application as withdrawn. The appellants later obtained ex parte special leave on May 25, 1971. It was mentioned in para 5 of the special leave petition that their application for leave in the High Court was rejected "on merits, but not as being out of time".

2. A preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondent that the special leave granted in this case should be revoked as the appellants failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 2 of Order 21 of the SC Rules inasmuch as there was no order of the High Court refusing to grant the certificate.

3. Under Order 21, Rule 2 "where an appe












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top