SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 520

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.K. MATHEW AND S. MURTAZA FAZL ALI , JJ.
State of M.P. and another, Appellants
Versus
Rameshwar Prasad (Dead) by L. Rs, and others. Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 521 of 1971
Decided on l0-12-1975.
Advocates appeared 
Mr. Ram Panjwani, Dy. Advocate General Madhya Pradesh and (Mr. H. S. Parihar, Advocate for Mr. I. N; Shroff, Advocate with him), for Appellants: M/s. P. P. Rao and S. P. Nayar, Advocates, for Respondent No. 2.

Advocates:
H.S.PARIHAR, P.P.Rao, RAM PANJWANI, S.N.NAYAR

Headnote:

States Reorganisation Act. 1956 - Sections 115,115(2),115(5) – Recruited as Excise Sub-Inspector by then Government of C.P.and Berar - On June 1 1947, 215 Sales tax Act came into force in erstwhile State of and in 1948 respondent was promoted as Assistant District Excise Officer and Assistant Sales Tax Officer in Region - In 1949 States of Vindhya Pradesh and Madhya Bharat were formed - On April 1, 1950 Sales Tax Act came into force in Vindhya Pradesh and a month later i.e., on May 1. 1950 Sales Tax Act was enforced in Madhya Bharat. Thereafter in accordance with the report given by States Reorganisation Commission States Reorganisation Act was passed by which new State of Madhya Pradesh was carved out by merging erstwhile States of Madhya Bharat Vindhya Pradesh and Bhopal - Appellants have produced before us White Paper issued by Government regarding merging and reorganisation of various States referred to above which is not in dispute at all. After the reorganisation services of the respondent were allocated to new State of Madhya Pradesh -Court might further mention that prior to the integration of Vindhya Pradesh and Madhya Bharat both States had their similar Sales Tax Act which was known as internal Customs Duty and there were number of officers who were manning Tax Organisation in those states holding almost ranks equal to respondent. - Appellants that as Sales Tax Department in the integration States of Madhya Pradesh was new persons absorbed in Department brought with them seniority already assigned to them - It was also pointed out in counter-affidavit that in these circumstances it cannot be said that as Sales Tax Department came into existence in 1950 in Madhya Bharat and Vindhya Pradesh regions personnel of these regions ipso facto became junior to those in region where Act had come into force in 1947 – Court fully agree with the explanation given by appellants in counter-affidavit as same appears to be reasonable and convincing, and seeks to chalk out an objective formula so that least prejudice is caused to employees concerned - It is manifest that the services rendered in erstwhile princely States by the officers who were put above the respondent were taken into account in the equated posts - Thus equation of posts was in conformity with principles laid down in Section 115 of States Reorganisation Act and was done in consultation with the Advisory Committee and was finally approved by Central Government – Held, Court opinion procedure adopted in this case does not contravene the 218 provisions of Sec, 115 (5) of the said Act, because it was Central Government which laid down the principles for integration, it was Central Government which considered representations and passed final orders, and both preliminary and final gradation lists were prepared and published by State Government under the direction and with the sanction of the Central Government. – Court are satisfied that Government had prepared final gradation list after an objective and thorough consideration of various aspects of career of the employees and principles which governed list were wholly in consonance with provisions at Section 115 of States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Appeal allowed

JUDGMENT

FAZL ALI, J.:— This is an appeal by special leave by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated September 20. 1969, by which the final gradation list of seniority of certain officers prepared by the Government following the integration of the Madhya Pradesh State after merging the erstwhile States of Maha Koshal, Madhya Bharat, Vindhya Pradesh and Bhopal has been partially quashed. The respondent in whose favour the High Court decided the case is already dead and has therefore no interest in the result of the proceedings. But as the gradation list has been struck down by the High Court, the Government as also the officers who had been given a particular seniority are undoubtedly affected by the order of the High Court. That is why both the State of Madhya Pradesh and the Union of India have pressed this appeal.

2. The facts of the case lie within a very narrow compass. In 1938 the respondent Rameshwar Prasad was recruited as Excise Sub-Inspector by the then Government of C.P.and Berar. On June 1 1947, 215 the Sales tax Act came into force in the erstwhile State of Maha Koshal and in 1948 the respondent was promoted as Assistant District Excise Officer and Assistant Sales Tax Officer in the Maha Koshal Region. In 1949 the States of Vindhya Pradesh and Madhya Bharat were formed. On April 1, 1950 the Sales Tax Act came into force in Vindhya Pradesh and a month later i.e., on May 1. 1950, the Sales Tax Act was enforced in Madhya Bharat. Thereafter in accordance with the report given by the States Reorganisation Commission, the States Reorganisation Act was passed by which the new State of Madhya Pradesh was carved out by merging the erstwhile States of Maha Koshal. Madhya Bharat, Vindhya Pradesh and Bhopal. The appellants have produced before us the White Paper issued by the Government regarding the merging and reorganisation of the various States referred to above which is not in dispute at all. After the reorganisation, the services of the respondent were allocated to the new State of Madhya Pradesh. We might further mention that prior to the integration of Vindhya Pradesh and Madhya Bharat both the States had their similar Sales Tax Act which was known as internal Customs Duty and there were number of officers who were manning the Tax Organisation in those states holding almost ranks equal to the respondent.

3. After the reorganisation of the States it became necessary to prepare a various Departments so that the officers who were allocated to the new State of Madhya Pradesh did not suffer any prejudice. Section 115 of the States Reorganisation Act. 1956 provided amongst others that the Central Government, by general or special order. was to determine the successor State to which every person referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 115 was to be allotted sub-section (5) of Section 115 enjoined on the Central Government to establish one or more Advisory Committees for the purpose of division and integration of the services among the new State and ensuring of fair and equitable treatment to all persons affected by the provisions of the Section and the proper consideration of any representation made by such persons. In pursuance of these statutory provisions the Central Government appointed an Advisory Committee for the newly integrated State of Madhya Pradesh to prepare a gradation list which would reflect the seniority of the officers concerned in a fair and equitable manner so that no prejudice or injustice was caused to any officer by virtue of the integration of the States According to the appellants on the recommendations of the Advisory Committee certain principles for determining the seniority of the officers coming from the erstwhile States were determined and in accordance with the same a provisional gradation list was prepared showing seniority of the officers as on November 1, 1956. These principles were formulated by virtue of a Notification No. 2581/2577/ V-ST,


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top