SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 467

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. RAY C.J.I. AND M.H. BEG, R.S. SARKARIA AND P.N. SHINGHAL, JJ.
S. K. Bhate and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 469 of 1971
Decided on 20-11-1975.
Advocates appeared
V. M. Tarkunde Sr. Advocate, (M/s. V. N. Ganpule and P. C. Kapoor, Advocate with him), for Petitioners; Mr. G. L. Sanghi Sr. Advocate, (Mr. S. P. Nayar, Advocate with him), for Respondents Nos. 1-4.

Advocates:
G.L.SANGHI, P.C.KAPUR, S.P.NAIR, V.M.TARKUNDE, V.N.GANPULE

Headnote:

Constitution of India - Article 16, 32 - Director General of Ordnance Factories, Respondent No.2, issued an advertisement for direct recruitment to grade of Foreman, Assistant Foremen, Chargemen Grade I and Chargemen Grade II. At time of this advertisement, all petitioners, except petitioner were already serving as officiating Supervisors of A Grade of Class III employees. In answer to advertisement for appointment to temporary posts with prospects of being "considered for permanent appointment in due course", petitioners, who possessed minimum qualifications prescribed, applied for direct recruitment which was open to them also - Petitioners were called for interview by a letter issued by General Manager, High Explosives Factory but, after interviews, no letters of appointment were received by the petitioners other than petitioner - Promoted from their substantive grade of Supervisor A to Chargemen Grade II by the General Manager of their factory, on short term basis, by virtue of powers delegated to him. Petitioner No.12, who was not in service at all before, was appointed a temporary chargeman – Held, Petitioners cannot also claim any benefit resulting from being treated as persons belonging to the same class as respondents 5 to 16 whose places on the seniority list are questioned by them as amounting to illegal supersessions of the petitioners. We may mention here that counsel appearing for the Union of India, Respondent No.1, and the Director General Ordnance Factory, Respondent No.2, and other officials, has fairly, conceded that so far as case of Petitioner No.11 is concerned, it stands on a special footing and that his clients are considering it on that footing. Counsel for the petitioners has also conceded that so far as 3 of the petitioners are concerned, they have been rightly treated as direct recruits - Counsel for the Union of India and its officials, has stated to Court that none of petitioners will be reverted to his substantive post merely on the ground that he was treated as a direct recruit - Question of inter se seniority is a different matter. The petitioners have been unable to establish that they have been denied their seniority in violation of any right under Article 16 of the Constitution - "It was for the petitioner to satisfy the Court that he was not given the senior grade although he satisfied all the required conditions of it and that others, who were promoted into it, were given unjustifiable preference over him" - Court not satisfied that the seniority list has been prepared in violation of any rule or principle of justice, we are unable to accept the petition before us - Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

BEG J.:—Twenty two petitioners, under Article 32 of the Constitution, have come to this Court with the following assertions : (1) They are employed as civilian non-gazetted Officers holding posts of Chargemen Grade II (Chemists) in High Explosives Factory, Kirkee, which is one of the 28 Ordnance Factories, located all over India, controlled by opposite party No.2, the Director 364 General of Ordnance Factories, with his Head Office at Calcutta.

2. The Factory has four cadres of officers : (i) Gazetted officers; (ii) Non-Gazetted officers; (iii) Non-Industrial employees; (iv) Industrial employees. The petitioners belong to the second cadre which has four grades: (a) Foremen; (b) Assistant Foremen; (c) Chargemen Gr. I; (d) Chargemen Grade II. The 3rd cadre of non-industrial employees has two grades; (i) Supervisor A Grade; and (ii) Supervisor B grade. The employees of the 3rd cadre are classified as Class III employees in the general scheme of classification of Govt. servants who are governed by Indian Ordnance Factories (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Class III Personnel) Rules.

3. The seniority rules of Gazetted and Non-Gazetted officers of the Ordnance Factories and laid down in office Memorandum dated 4th January, 1956, amended in 1961 (Annexure B ).

4. The Director General of Ordnance Factories, Respondent No.2, issued an advertisement, D/- 14-11-1962, for direct recruitment to the grade of Foreman, Assistant Foremen, Chargemen Grade I and Chargemen Grade II. At the time of this advertisement, all the petitioners, except petitioner No.12, were already serving as officiating Supervisors of A Grade of Class III employees. In answer to the advertisement for appointment to temporary posts with prospects of being "considered for permanent appointment in due course", the petitioners, who possessed the minimum qualifications prescribed, applied for direct recruitment which was open to them also. The petitioners were called for interview by a letter issued by the General Manager, High Explosives Factory, Kirkee, on 7th February, 1963, but, after the interviews, no letters of appointment were received by the petitioners other than petitioner No.12.

5. They were promoted between April, 1963, and November, 1963, from their substantive grade of Supervisor A to Chargemen Grade II by the General Manager of their factory, on short term basis, by virtue of powers delegated to him. Petitioner No.12, who was not in service at all before, was appointed a temporary chargeman. Grade, II, in April, 1963, as a result of his selection after interview. Respondents 5 to 16, however, entered the grade of Chargemen Grade II between 1st December, 1963, and 4th February, 1965, and were also shown as temporary Chargemen Grade II, but they were not holding any post in the grade of Supervisors. The respondents were apprentices before entering into the Grade II of Chargemen.

6. The promotions of the petitioners were given retrospective effect, by an order dated 11th June, 1965, passed by the Director General Ordnance Factories. In December, 1967, however, the petitioners were superseded by others who were alleged to be their juniors. The petitioners made representations and sent reminders which were not replied to. Respondents 5 to 16 were promoted from Chargemen Grade II to the grade of Assistant Foremen by an order of the respondent No.2 Director General Ordnance Factories dated 17th September, 1971. This order according to the petitioners amounted to another supersession of the petitioners who were shown as holding permanent posts only as Supervisors of A Grade in 1971. The petitioners, therefore, came to this Court on 14th December, 1971 against the orders dated 17th September, 1971, which amounted to their supersession.

7. The petitioners also allege that, as no orders were communicated to them showing that they were considered direct recruits by the Ordnance Depot by the Ministry of Defence Production in the Govt. of India or


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top