SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 546

R.S.SARKARIA, A.N.RAY, M.H.BEG, P.N.SHINGHAL
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Madan Mohan Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.SINGH, L.M.SINGHVI, Udaipratap Singh

JUDGMENT

SARKARIA, J.:—Respondents 1, 2 and 3 herein made an application under Article 226 of the Constitution alleging that the decision of the Bihar State Government fixing the seniority of Respondents 4 below Shri C. P. Singh (Respondent 5) and Shri E. Rehman (Respondent 6) and above the applicants, in the cadre of Bihar Superior Judicial Service was illegal and ultra vires. They prayed for a writ of mandamus, direction or order quashing the same and directing the State Government to revise the applicant s seniority vis-a-vis the opposite parties, (Respondents 4, 5 and 6 herein).

2. The applicants also challenged the upgrading of the posts of Deputy Registrar, Patna High Court and the Secretary, Bihar Legislative Assembly with effect from June 17, 1959 till the posts were held by Respondents 5 and 6, respectively. 405

3. A Full Bench of the High Court, partly allowed the writ application and quashed the order of the State Government placing Respondent 4 below Respondents 5 and 6 in seniority. The material facts were these :

4. Respondents 4, 5 and 6 were appointed as Munsifs on the same date under one notification. On April 25, 1959, these three officers were holding the posts of





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top