SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 429

A.C.GUPTA, R.S.SARKARIA, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
State of Mysore – Appellant
Versus
C. N. Vijendra Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.G.K.Achar, NARAYAN NETTAR

JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, J.:— On January 27, 1961 the Chief Conservator of Forests, Mysore, sent a letter to the Govt. of Mysore stating that large-scale illicit cutting of sandal-wood trees in the Forests of Sandur Range had caused a huge loss to the Government and that such devastation of forests could not have been possible without the connivance of the respondent, C. N. Vijendra Rao who was working as the Divisional Forest Officer. By an order dated February 16, 1961 the Government of Mysore placed the respondent under suspension pending inquiry , in order that he may not interfere with the conduct of the inquiry or tamper with the documentary evidence.

2. The respondent was later prosecuted under Section 120-B of the Penal Code on the charge that he, along with others, had conspired to smuggle sandalwood. On June 17, 1966 the First Class Magistrate, Bellary, acquitted the respondent.

3. On January 24, 1967 the Government of Mysore passed an order that the respondent should be deemed to have been retired from service on January 24, 1962 being the date on which, on his completion of the 55th year, he had attained the age of superannuation. On May 23, 1967 the respondent filed a writ







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top