P.N.BHAGWATI, R.S.SARKARIA, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Narain Tandon – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SARKARIA, J. :—The common questions that arise for determination in these appeals on certificate directed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court are :
(1) Whether for purposes of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short the Food Act), there is no sale of food which is provided by a hotelier to a guest when a consolidated charge is made for room and the other amenities, including food and when no rebate is allowed for any meal which may not be taken by the guest?
(2) Whether the expression "store", as used in Section 7 and Section 16 of the Act, means storage simpliciter of storing the sale?
2. In answer to the first question the Full Bench of the High Court, to which these questions were referred held that when a composite charge is made for residential accommodation and food by a hotelier, there is no sale of food to the customer within the contemplation of the Food Act. On the second question, its answer was that the word "store" used in Section 7 and Section 16 of the Act means storage for sale.
3. The question arose in these circumstances :
M/s. Associated Hotels of India Ltd. (for short, Associated Hotels) runs Hotels, one of them is Oberoi Maidens Ho
distinguished : THE STATE OF PUNJAB V. M/S. ASSOCIATED HOTELS OF INDIA LTD.
followed : THE FOOD INSPECTOR, CALICUT CORPORATION V. CHERUKATTIL GOPALAN AND ANOTHER
followed : MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI V. KACHEROO MAL
referred to : BHAGWAN DAS JAGDISH CHANDER V. DELHI ADMINISTRATION
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.