SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 297

A.N.RAY, K.K.MATHEW, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Raja Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.M.Dikshit, O.P.RANA, S.K.Bagga, YOGESHAR PRASAD

JUDGMENT

MATHEW, J. :—The appellants filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State Government superseding the Municipal Board, Philibit. The Municipal Board which was superseded by the order of Government was constituted on 29-6-1971. Previous to the constitution of that Board, the 733 State Government had issued a notice under Section 30 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 (hereinafter called the Act ) on 15-2-1971 to show cause why the Board, of which the superseded Board was the successor, should not be superseded. That Board sent a reply to the notice. Thereafter no further action was taken in the matter by the Government and the Board served it full term of office.

2. A notice dated 29-9-1972 under Section 30 of the Act was issued to the Board to show cause why it should not be superseded. The notice was received by the Board on 4-10-1972. The Board passed a resolution on 16-10-1972 authorizing the President of the Board to submit an interim reply and to take one month s further time for submitting a final reply in answer to the charges levelled against the Board. The President sent the interim reply on 10-10-1972 (sic) denying all the charges against the Boa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top