A.N.RAY, K.K.MATHEW, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Raja Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
MATHEW, J. :—The appellants filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the State Government superseding the Municipal Board, Philibit. The Municipal Board which was superseded by the order of Government was constituted on 29-6-1971. Previous to the constitution of that Board, the 733 State Government had issued a notice under Section 30 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 (hereinafter called the Act ) on 15-2-1971 to show cause why the Board, of which the superseded Board was the successor, should not be superseded. That Board sent a reply to the notice. Thereafter no further action was taken in the matter by the Government and the Board served it full term of office.
2. A notice dated 29-9-1972 under Section 30 of the Act was issued to the Board to show cause why it should not be superseded. The notice was received by the Board on 4-10-1972. The Board passed a resolution on 16-10-1972 authorizing the President of the Board to submit an interim reply and to take one month s further time for submitting a final reply in answer to the charges levelled against the Board. The President sent the interim reply on 10-10-1972 (sic) denying all the charges against the Boa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.