SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 342

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
S. T. O. , Moradabad – Appellant
Versus
H. Farid Ahmed And Sons – Respondent


Advocates:
O.P.RANA, PRAMOD SVARUP, S.C.Manchanda, S.Markandaya

JUDGMENT

FAZL ALI, J. :—These appeals by the sales-tax officer have come up to this Court by certificate of fitness granted by the High Court of Allahabad. 757 The appeals involve a very short point, turning upon the interpretation of Sec. 7A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It appears that the respondent is a partnership firm, carrying on business in the district of Moradabad. The assessment quarters in question are two quarters of 1968. By an order dated 31st December, 1968, the sales-tax officer found from the turn-over of the firm as revealed from the quareterly returns filed by the assessee that it disclosed an assesseble income. The sales-tax officer, therefore, proceeded to make a provisional assessment in respect of the portion of the assessment year concerned, purporting to act under S. 7A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The assessee being aggrieved by this order, instead of going in appeal against the order, challenged the same before the High Court praying that the sales-tax officer had no jurisdiction to make a provisional assessment, because the assessee had in fact filed a return. The argument appears to











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top