SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. RAY C.J.I. AND N.L. UNTWALIA, J.
Indian Sugar and Refineries Ltd., Appellant
Versus
Amarvathi Service Co-op. Society Ltd., Respondent.
Civil Appeals Nos. 2070-2074 of 1970
Decided on 9-11-1975.
Advocates appeared
Mr. V. S. Desai, Sr. Advocate, (M/s. P. C. Bhartari, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and R. Narain Advocates of M/s. J. B. Dadachanji & Co. with him), for Appellant; Mr. A. K. Sen, Sr. Advocate, (M/s. S. S. Javali, and B. P. Singh, Advocates with him), for Respondent No. 1; Mr. S. N. Prasad and Mr. S. P. Nayar, Advocates, for Respondent - Union of India.
Sugar Cane Control Order, 1966 – Essential Commodities Act, 1955 – Sugar Cane Control (Additional Powers) Act, 1962 – sQuashing orders - Several respondent Co-operative Societies filed writ petitions in High Court for quashing orders Government of India impeached orders granted exemption, partially or wholly, to appellant under Clause Sugar Cane Control Order, 1966 – Government of India promulgated Sugar Cane Control Order on Control Order empowered Government, inter alia, to fix minimum price payable by manufacturer of sugar to grower of sugar cane – Government was competent to fix different prices depending on areas and qualities of sugar cane or on basis of recovery of sugar from sugar cane – Control Order was repealed and replaced by Sugarcane Control Order, 1966 to which reference has already been made – Control Order saved all orders made and actions taken under repealed order – Control Order Government was competent to denote an area where sugarcane is grown as a reserved area for a factory – Held, Control Order does not affect right and interest of growers – In providing for payment of additional price additional price fixation authority takes into account relevant considerations relating to conditions of sugarcane growers as well as promotion of sugar industry during relevant period – Additional price fixation authority also considers conditions and circumstances relating to appellant factory in determining additional price payable necessary for Government to invite the points of view or objections of growers on application made by factories producing sugar seeking exemption from payment of additional price power to grant exemption to factories from payment of additional price is intimately connected with right of sugarcane growers to claim additional situations in which a duty will arise to act judicially according to natural justice cannot be exhaustively enumerated to act judicially will arise in exercise of a power to deprive a person of legitimate interest or expectation that additional price would be paid – Appeals dismissed.
JUDGMENT
RAY, C. J. :—These appeals are by certificate from the judgment of the High Court of Mysore dated 4 May, 1970. The several respondent Co-operative Societies filed writ petitions in the High Court for quashing orders dated 11 September, 1968 passed by the Government of India. The impeached orders granted exemption, partially or wholly, to the appellant under Clause 5(3) of the Sugar Cane Control Order, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the 1966 Control Order) from the payment of additional cane price fixed by the Price Fixation Authority under clause 5 (4) of the 1966 Control Order. The High Court quashed the orders challenged by the respondents.
2. The use and supply of sugar cane is controlled under the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Government of India promulgated the Sugar Cane Control Order on 27 August, 1955. The 1955 Control Order empowered the Government, inter alia, to fix the minimum price payable by the manufacturer of sugar to the grower of sugar cane. The Government was competent to fix different prices depending on the areas and qualities of sugar cane or on the basis of recovery of sugar from sugar cane. In 1962 the Sugar Cane Control (Additional Powers) Act, 1962 came in existence. In pursuance of powers conferred by the 1962 Act the Central Government amended the 1955 Control Order by introducing Clause 3A providing for payment of additional price for sugarcane purchased by producers of sugar during each of the four successive years beginning from 1 November, 1958.
3. The 1955 Control Order was repealed and replaced by the Sugarcane Control Order, 1966 to which reference has already been made. The 1966 Control Order saved all orders made and actions taken under the repealed order. Under Clause 6 of the 1966 Control Order the Government was competent to denote an area where sugarcane is grown as a reserved area for a factory. The sugarcane grown in that area is required to be sold to the factory allotted. The Central Government determines the quantity of sugarcane to be supplied by the growers in the reserved area and the quantity of sugarcane which the factory requires for crushing during any year. The growers are required to enter into agreements with the factory to supply sugarcane of the quantity fixed under the provisions of the 1966 Control Order. Restrictions 777 are placed on the growers from using sugarcane grown by them for other purposes. The Government thus controls all aspects of the use of sugarcane grown in the reserved area. It can prohibit or restrict or otherwise regulate export of sugarcane from any area except under and in accordance with a permit issued in that behalf.
4. Clause 3 of the 1966 Control Order provides for fixation of minimum price of sugarcane payable by manufacturers of sugar to the growers. In determining the minimum price, the Government is required to take into account (a) cost of production of sugarcane, (b) return to the grower from alternative crops and the general trend of prices of agricultural commodities; (c) the availability of sugar to the consumer at a fair price; (d) the price at which sugar produced from sugar-cane is sold by producers of sugar; and (e) the recovery of sugar from sugarcane.
5. Clause 5 of the 1966 Control Order provides for payment of additional price. Sub-clause (1) of Clause 5 provides that in respect of sugarcane purchased by producers of sugar during each of the four successive years beginning from 1 November, 1958 the producer is required to pay an additional price in addition to the minimum price fixed under Clause 3 (1) of the 1966 Control Order. The additional price is fixed in accordance with the provisions of the Schedules to the Order. On determination of the price, the same is required to be intimated in writing to the producer of sugar, growers, Co-operative Societies of growers or the local growers association. Sub-clause (5) of Clause 5 of the 1966 Control Order provides for an appeal to the Government
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.