SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 531

M.H.BEG, P.N.SHINGHAL, R.S.SARKARIA, A.N.RAY
Hukam Chand Shyam Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
B.D.SHARMA, K.R.NAGARAJA, L.N.Sinha, M.Qamaruddin, R.A.GUPTA, S.K.MEHTA, S.P.NAIR

JUDGMENT

SARKARIA J.:—This judgment will govern the disposal of these two appeals which arise out of a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellants and others under Art. 226 of the Constitution.

2. On November 27, 1972, the Administrator of Delhi, made an order under Section 5 of the 791 Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (for short, the Act) authorising the Superintendent of Police, North District of take temporary possession "until further orders of certain specified telephones installed in rooms and cabins of the building known as Coronation Hotel, Fatehpuri, Delhi. The order reads as under.

"Whereas the Administrator of Delhi is satisfied that illegal forward trading (satta) in agricultural commodities is being practised on a large scale through the following telephones installed in the rooms/cabins in the premises of the Coronation Hotel, Fatehpuri, Delhi, thereby affecting adversely the price of the supply essential to the life of the community.

Whereas public emergency exists and the Administrator, Delhi is satisfied that the continuation of satta at the aforesaid premises through the telephones given above is prejudicial to public



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top