SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 441

R.S.SARKARIA, P.N.BHAGWATI
Chandmal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SARKARIA, J.:—This appeal is directed against a judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan.

2. The appellants Chandmal and Ranglal were tried by the Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh in respect of 918 offences under Sections 302, 201 and 411, Penal Code. The Judge convicted Chandmal under Section 302, Penal Code, for committing the murder of Mst. Nazar Bai and sentenced him to imprisonment for life. He further convicted him under Section 411, Penal Code, as a dishonest receiver of stolen property of the deceased and sentenced him to one year s rigorous imprisonment. He was convicted under Section 201, Penal Code, also, but no separate sentence was passed on that count. Ranglal was acquitted of the charges under Ss. 302 and 201, Penal Code but was convicted for an offence under Section 411, Penal Code and sentenced to one year s rigorous imprisonment. The High Court dismissed the appeal of the convicts. Hence this appeal by special leave.

3-4. The prosecution story, as it emerges from the record, was as follows:

Mst. Nazar Bai, an old widow was residing alone and separately from her son, Shankar Lal, P. W. 11 in the town of Chittor. On Karwa Chauth day, the 24th October, 1964, at abo











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top