SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 138

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
 
H.R. KHANNA AND P.K. GOSWAMI, JJ.
M/s. National Transport Co., Appellant
 
Versus
 
State of Bihar, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 1462 of 1971
 
Decided on 25-3-1976.
Advocates appeared
M/s. A. K. Sen, S. T. Desai and Somen Bose, Sr. Advocates, (M/s. D. N. Mukherjee and K. N. Jain Advocates with him), for Appellant; Mr. V. S. Desai, Sr. Advocate, (Mr. B. P. Singh, Advocate with him), for Respondents.

Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, B.P.SINGH, D.N.MUKHERJI, K.N.JAIN, S.T.DESAI, SOMEN BOSE, V.S.DESAI

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 32 - Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (Carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 - Sections 21B (1), 4 , 7 (5) and 2 (d) - Lubricants and also for loss in the way as per agreement - Agreements - Inspection of office of assessee - Transporting the cement - Appellant, M/s. National Transport Company, is a transport undertaking without its transport - Appellant was sole transporter by Associated Cement Company different stockists at various places - In order to have some sort of uniformity in price at different places manufacturing company used to fix transport charges according to a schedule - Assessee s contract with manufacturing company commenced some time - Since the assessee did not have its own fleet of trucks covered by public carrier permits belonging to various persons at different times for transporting cement - Assessee was not registered under Section 4 of the Act - Surprise inspection of office of assessee and certain books of accounts containing accounts of transport charges realised by assessee for transporting of cement from the Sindri factory to the stockists in were seized – Held, Legal liability for payment of tax under the Act is well known to appellant carrying on transport business - Appellant has taken charge of the vehicles for purpose of collection of tax for carriage of goods - Appellant has actually collected freight from the stockists on delivery of cement bags - Appellant has only paid to truck owners "the hire charges" as per its own schedule of rates without any mention of tax - Vehicle from one place to another but to charge or control for fulfilment of legal obligation under Act for payment of taxes for carriage of goods or passengers - Whether a certain person is in charge of the vehicle for the time being depends always on particular facts of each case and answer cannot be put in strait-jacket of a formula - Present case we are clearly of opinion appellant comes within meaning of third clause of definition under Section 2 (d) of Act – Court should observe once tax is realised for a particular transaction from one category of owner as defined, no further tax can be collected for the same carriage from any other person even though the person also may come within the definition of "owner" Act - Appeal dismissed

JUDGMENT

GOSWAMI, J. :—This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Patna High Court in a reference under Section 21B (1) of the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (Carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (briefly the Act) as amended.

2. The facts as appearing from the statement of case annexing the various orders of the authorities may briefly be stated :

3. The appellant, M/s. National Transport Company, is a transport undertaking without its transport. The appellant (hereinafter to be described as the assessee) was the sole transporter by the Associated Cement Company at Sindri (briefly the company) from Sindri to different stockists at various places in Bihar and West Bengal. In order to have some sort of uniformity in price at different places the manufacturing company used to fix the transport charges according to a schedule. The assessee s contract with the manufacturing company commenced some time on October 12, 1963. Since the assessee did not have its own fleet of trucks covered by public carrier permits belonging to various persons at different times for transporting the cement. The assessee was not registered under Section 4 of the Act. On September 3, 1966, there was a surprise inspection of the office of the assessee and certain books of accounts containing accounts of transport charges realised by the assessee for transporting of cement from the Sindri factory to the stockists in Bihar and West Bengal were seized. The assessee also produced some books of accounts during the hearing before the Officer. The assessee maintained his accounts ledger-wise in respect of the transport charges realised and realisable from different stockists of Bihar and West Bengal for transport of cement by it from the Sindri factory to their godowns. There were two ledgers. One was party-wise showing charges realised or realisable from the stockists and the other truck wise showing hire charges paid to various trucks. The assessee also produced a list of trucks showing the names of the truck owners with their respective places of residence. Out of thirty six trucks, twenty four were registered in Bihar and twelve in West Bengal. Agreements with 1076 the truck owners were also produced by the assessee. The bills from the petrol supplying company which were paid by the assessee were also filed showing the total amount and the truck-wise amount. The ledger party-wise showed rates charged from the stockists. The ledger truck-wise showed hire charges and also deductions on account of petrol, diesel and other lubricants and also for loss in the way as per agreement.

4. On the basis of the statement furnished by the assessee as corroborated by the books of accounts maintained by it the Assessing Officer determined the total taxable amount and imposed a tax of Rs. 1,41,618.37 by his order of November 1, 1965. A penalty of Rs. 5000/- was also imposed under Section 7 (5) of the Act.

5. The assessee appealed to the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes without success. Thereafter the assessee preferred an application in revision before the Commercial Taxes Tribunal, Bihar, which also met with the same fate.

6. The Tribunal, however, on the application of the assessee under Sec. 21-B (1) of the Act referred the following question of law to the High Court.

"Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal has rightly held the applicant to be the owner of the vehicles within the meaning of Section 2 (d) of the Act and whether the imposition of tax and levy of penalty was legal and justified."

7. The High Court noted the facts found by the Tribunal as follows :-

"(a) The assessee was the sole transporting company of the cement of the manufacturing company,

(b) it had engaged certain trucks for use in his (sic) transport work,

(c) it was providing petrol and oil for the running of the trucks in the transport work, although the prices paid by the assessee were later on adjusted in the hiring














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top