SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 428

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.K. GOSWAMI AND N.L. UNTWALIA, JJ.
Prabhakar and others, Appellants
 
Versus
 
The State of Maharashtra and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 721 of 1974
 
Decided on 22-10-1975*
Advocates appeared
Mr. V. M. Tarkunde, Sr. Advocate, (M/s. Sharad Manohar, v. N. Ganpule and P. C. Kappor, Advocates with him), for Appellants; Mr. M. N. Shroof, Advocate, (For Nos. 1-3; Mr. K. K. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate, (M/s. R. K. Garg, S. C. Agarwala and V. S. Francis, Advocates with him, (for No. 4) for Respondents.

Advocates:
E.C.AGARWAL, K.K.SINGHVI, M.V.SHROFF, P.C.KAPUR, R.K.GARG, Sharad Manohar, V.M.TARKUNDE, V.N.GANPULE, V.S.FRANCIS

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14 and 16 - Bombay Police act, 1951 - clause (b) of Section 5 - Police Forces (Control and direction) Act, 1949 - Sought to be formed - Intermixing and inter-transfer of officers - Police forces - Mofussil police force governed by the Bombay District Police Act, 1890 and City Police of Bombay governed by City of Bombay Police Act, 1902 - Some steps for intermixing and inter-transfer of officers of one force to other were taken by making some provisions in Bombay Act XVI of 1949 called Police Forces (Control and direction) Act, 1949 - Bombay Police Act of 1951 repealed earlier Acts - Order came into force on and provision was made in clause 4 empowering State Government it thought fit to order transfer of any police officer belonging to combined cadre from Greater Bombay to any District and vice versa - Combined cadre was sought to be formed of Order - Two separate lists of officers in accordance with respective seniority were, however maintained even under clause 3 of Order - Previously was one Police Training School cadets for training were sent - Period of their training was 18 months - On passing out the training the cadets were appointed to posts of Sub-Inspectors of Police - Held, Cadet who received his full training for 18 months for no fault of his was appointed later than a cadet who started training later but was appointed earlier than former - There was nothing wrong, illegal or unreasonable in making a provision in sub-clause (a) in such a situation the commencement of the period of training will be taken as the date for the purposes of fixation of seniority - There was a reasonable and rational nexus between the object and the rule - It was for rule making authority to decide and to choose in such a situation - Either commencement of training appointment - High Court theoretically was correct but materials were placed before us from various affidavits to show hardly there was such a case which had got advantage of clause even after failure in examination - There was one such case of hardship of not passing out examination in time due to reasons beyond the control of cadet - Clause 7 (1) (a), in our opinion, was not meant to give any undue advantage to a nondeserving police officer who failed to pass training examination at the proper time - Appeal allowed

JUDGMENT

UNTWALIA, J.:—The only point which falls for our determination in this appeal by special leave is whether clause 7 (1) (a) of the Bombay Police Officers (Combined Cadre) Conditions of Service Order, 1954, hereinafter called the Order. made by the Government of Bombay in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of Section 5 of the Bombay Police act, 1951 is constitutionally invalid being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India as has been held by the Bombay High Court in the Writ Petition filed by respondent No. 4.

2. In the Province or the State of Bombay, there were two separate police forces - the Mofussil police force governed by the Bombay District Police Act, 1890 and the City Police of Bombay governed by the City of Bombay Police Act, 1902. Some steps for intermixing and inter-transfer of officers of one force to the other were taken by making some provisions in Bombay Act XVI of 1949 called the Police Forces (Control and direction) Act, 1949. The Bombay Police Act of 1951 repealed the earlier Acts. Under the Order which came into force on and from the 1st August, 1954, provision was made in clause 4 empowering the State Government whenever it thought fit to order the transfer of any police officer belonging to the combined cadre from Greater Bombay to any District and vice versa. The combined cadre was sought to be formed under cl. 3 of the Order. Two separate lists of the officers in accordance with their respective seniority were, however maintained even under clause 3 of the Order. Previously there was one Police Training School at Nasik where cadets for training were sent. The period of their training was 18 months. On passing out the training the cadets were appointed to the posts of Sub-Inspectors of Police. Some were appointed to the District Police force and some were sent to the Police Force of Greater Bombay. In the year 1939 due to certain exigencies of administration such as introduction of the scheme of Prohibition and the impending second World War more Sub-Inspectors were needed to be appointed for Greater Bombay. A new Training School was opened at Naigaum a part of Greater Bombay. This new Training School remained in existence for about a decade from the 1st of May, 1939 to 1st of June, 1949. The period of training was reduced from 18 months to a much shorter period varying from 3 to 8 months. Thus cadets of particular batches after completion of training for a shorter period were straightaway appointed as Sub-Inspectors of Police in Greater Bombay. This went on for a period of about 10 years as already stated. On the other hand, almost invariably, the training period at Nasik School remained of 18 months. On the general principle of fixation of seniority, the two seniority lists which were maintained separately even under the Order, were maintained on the basis of their passing out the training and in order of merit obtained at the passing examination. But since after the formation of the combined cadre under the Order transfers were to the made under clause 4, a difficulty was felt in the matter of fixation of seniority vis-a-vis the officer who had been appointed after completion of full training period and the one who had been appointed on the training of a shorter period. To avoid this anomaly and difficulty, a provision was made in clause 7 of the Order thus:

"7. (1) When an officer who was in service immediately before the formation of the Combined Cadre is transferred under clause 4, his seniority among Police Officers of equivalent ranks in Greater Bombay or in the Districts, as the case may be shall be determined in the case of an officer who was appointed to a post either in Greater Bombay or in the 1095 Districts after a course of training at a Police Training School,-

(a) if the training commenced on any date between the period from 1st May 1939 to 1st June 1949 (both inclusive) with reference to the date on which training commenced;

(b) in other cases, with














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top