SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 137

A.N.RAY, JASWANT SINGH
Mohan Singh Malhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
O.P.Sharma, S.S.Khanduja, V.C.MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

JASWANT SINGH, J.:—The question that arises for decision in this appeal by certificate granted by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana against its judgment and order dated February 20, 1970 in L. P. A. No. 552 of 1968 is whether under Rule 5.32 (c) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, Vol. II, the Government can retire an employee on or after he attains the age of 55 years by giving him three months salary and allowances in lieu of three months notice.

2. The facts giving rise to the appeal lie in a short compass and may be stated thus:

3. Before the partition of the country, the appellant joined the Veterinary Department of the Punjab Government as an Assistant Surgeon on December, 1, 1933. In course 1429 of time, he was appointed as Director of Animal Husbandry and Warden of Fisheries which post he held from March 16, 1957, to August 14, 1959, when Shri Pritam Singh Brar was appointed Director in his place. On Shri Pritam Singh Brar s attaining the age of superannuation, the appellant was again appointed as Director, Animal Husbandry. on regular basis on August 4, 1965, On September 2, 1967, the appellant was served with the following order:-

"The Governor of Punjab is plea


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top