SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 214

P.N.SHINGHAL, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Vishwa Vijay Bharati – Appellant
Versus
Fakhrul Hassan – Respondent


Advocates:
B.C.DAS, G.K.Arora, N.S.DAS BEHL, O.P.Sharma, TIRATH SINGH MUNJRAL

JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, J.:—These appeals by special leave arise out of the judgment rendered by the High Court of Allahabad on February 13, 1970 in Second Appeals 67 and 68 of 1962.

2. Mahant Vishwa Nath Bharthi, the Sarbrahkar of the temple of Shankarji Maharaj, Khowja, gave lands belonging to the temple, admeasuring about 44 acres, on Thekd to one Sukai. The Thekanama was executed on June 5, 194 to be effective from July 1, 1942. The lease was to ensure for a period of 10 years and was due to expire on June 30, 1952. The Thekanama contained an express term that the Thekadar will not sub-let the leasehold property and that on the expiry of the period of lease he shall handover the possession of the property to the lessor.

3. In spite of this term against sub-letting, on July 27, 194 the lessee executed a power of attorney in favour of his nephews Haqiqullah and Ghani, apparently authorising them to cultivate the lands on his behalf. On the expiry of the period of lease the Mahant instituted a suit for ejectment of the lessee which was decreed on November 5, 1952.

4. The Mahant then filed an application for executing the decree but an objection was raised thereto by the respondents. Sa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top