SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 538

A.C.GUPTA, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
D. Papiah – Appellant
Versus
Mysore State Transport Appellate Tribunal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.R.NAGARAJA, S.V.Gupta, Shyamla Pillai, VINIT KUMAR

JUDGMENT

GUPTA, J.:— On the application of the appellant, the Regional Transport Authority, Mandya, granted him a contract carriage permit on February 8, 1972, valid for the entire State of Karnataka. The grant was cancelled by the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal by its order dated August 19, 1972 on appeal preferred by the third respondent, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. The appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore challenging the order of the Appellate Tribunal. The High Court dismissed the petition by its order dated November 29, 1974 agreeing with the Appellate Tribunal that the Regional Transport Authority, Mandya, had no jurisdiction to grant permits valid throughout the State of Karnataka in view of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of Sec. 45 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) The correctness of that decision is questioned by the appellant in this appeal by special leave.

2. Section 45 (1) with its first proviso which is the only part of the section relevant for the present purpose is in these terms:

"45. General provision as to applications for permits.-

(1) Every application for











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top