SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 226

P.K.GOSWAMI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER, H.R.KHANNA
Dewan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Bishambar Lal Khanna, J.RAMAMURTHY, NAUNIT LAL, R.M.Sachthey

JUDGMENT

GOSWAMI, J.:— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court by which the appellants application under Article 226 of the Constitution was rejected.

2. The appellant was a Verterinary Compounder serving at the material time under the Chairman, Panchyat Samiti, Hansi-I. The Zila Parishad Tribunal transferred him from Hansi-I block to Singhani (Loharu Block) by its resolution of June 30, 1967. The order appears to be transmitted by Memo No. 3201-A of July 6, 1967. On July 27, 1967, the Chairman of the Panchayat Samiti, Hansi-I, requested the Chairman of the Zila Parishad, Hissar, to reconsider the decision of transfer and to allow him to continue at his village Umra in public interest. A copy of this letter written to the Zila Parishad was forwarded to the appellant. Since the appellant did not comply with the order of transfer, the Chairman, Zila ParishadTribunal, served a notice upon him on August 13, 1967, to show cause as to why he should not be dismissed from service on the grounds mentioned in the notice. It is mentioned 1922 in the notice that this action has been taken under Section 124 of the P
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top