SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 133

H.R.KHANNA, P.K.GOSWAMI
Homely Industries – Appellant
Versus
Sales Tax Officer, Sector-v, Kanpur – Respondent


Advocates:
G.N.DIKSHIT, J.D.JAIN, KANVALJIT MIGLANI, O.P.RANA, S.C.Manchanda, Ujjal Singh

JUDGMENT

GOSWAMI, J. :— These are two appeals on certificates by the High Court of Allahabad from the judgments and orders of March 17, 1970.

2. The facts may briefly be stated :

The appellant Homely Industries is registered under the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act (briefly the Act), its sole proprietor was one Rashidul Hasan. He died on December 10, 1968, leaving behind three adult sons, namely, Syed Mohd. Ibrahim, Syed Mohd. Ismail and Syed Mohd. Ilias. The business was carried on by Rashidul Hasan under the name and style of Homely Industries. At the time of his death the assessment proceedings relating to the assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62 were pending before the Sales Tax Officer on remand from the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), Sales Tax, in pursuance of his order dated October 26, 1966.

3. It is said that after the death of Rashidul Hasan the business was continued by the sons by forming a partnership and Nazir Husain continued as the munim and also appeared before the Sales Tax Officer in the pending proceedings.

4. On December 10, 1968,Syed Mohd. Ibrahim, as legal heir and partner, sent an application through Nazir Husain informing the Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur, in conn





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top