SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 402

A.C.GUPTA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
P. Kumaraswamy – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
A.T.M.SAMPATH, B.SEN, E.C.AGARWAL, K.S.Ramamurthy, VINIT KUMAR

JUDGMENT

KRISHNA IYER, J. :— A single fundamental flaw in the order of the Appellate Tribunal (under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939), constrains us to allow this appeal challenging the High Courts refusal to interfere with the grant of the permit in favour of Respondent No. 2.

2. Many applicants for one Permit for a "short route" pressed their claims before the Regional Transport Authority which evaluated the relevant merits and awarded the permit to Applicant No. 6, who is the appellant before us. On appeal, Applicant No. 3, who is respondent No. 2 before us, succeeded. Whereupon, a writ petition was filed without success and the disappointed appellant has come to this Court by special leave.

3. The system of marks, under the Rules framed under the Act by the Tamil Nadu Government, prescribes the various qualifications for applicants for permits for passenger transport under the Motor Vehicles Act. Rule 155-A crystallises these considerations and describes them as guiding principles for grant of stage carriage permits. The rule itself emphasizes what is obvious, that the paramount consideration of the interest of the public, as enshrined in Section 47 (1), must be given full weight wh











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top