SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 515

N.L.UNTWALIA, P.K.GOSWAMI, P.N.BHAGWATI
Legal Remembrancer Of Government Of W. B. : State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Haridas Mundra – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.MENESSES, B.P.SINGH, D.MUKHERJI, H.MUNARA, M.N.SHROFF, V.S.DESAI

JUDGMENT

BHAGAWATI, J. :— These three appeals arise out of the same facts and it would, therefore, be convenient to dispose of them by a common judgment. The respondent in all the three appeals is one Haridas Mundra. He was at all material times the managing director of S. B. Industrial Development Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., who were the managing agents of a company called Richardson & Cruddas Ltd. He and his brothers Tulsidas Mundra were also directors of Richaredson & Cruddas Ltd. The Life Insurance Corporation of India, which was the largest shareholder, filed a petition in the High Court of Calcutta being Matter No. 357 of 1957 seeking relief against mismanagement of Richardson and Cruddas Ltd. under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. 1956. The respondents and other directors were impleaded as party-respondents to the petition. The High Court on the application of the Life Insurance Corporation, made an interim order sometime in December 1957 appointing Sir Dhirendra Mitra as Special Officer to manage the affairs of Richardson& Cruddas Ltd. There was an audit report made by M/s. Gutgutia & Co., Charted Accountants, in regard to the accounts of Richardsan & Cruddas Ltd., but the s






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top