SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 278

A.C.GUPTA, P.K.GOSWAMI, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
S. Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.G.K.Achar, GIRISH CHANDRA, P.S.NARASIMHA, Sabha Dikshit, SHYAMALA PAPPU

JUDGMENT

Chandrachud, J.:—On February 7, 1959 the appellant, S. Ramaswamy, was appointed as an Assistant Development Officer in the Directorate General of Technical Development in the Ministry of Industry and Civil Supplies, Government of India. In 1964 he was appointed as a Development Officer on an ad hoc basis and that appointment was regularized in May, 1966. On December 1, 1966 the post of Officer on Special Duty was created in the Directorate in order to deal effectively with the development of agrobased food processing industries. The Director General (Technical Development) recommended the appellant for appointment to the post and in course of time the appointment was duly made.

2. In 1974 a question arose regarding promotion to the selection post of Industrial Adviser in the Directorate, Respondents 6 to 11 and some others who were working as Development Officers filed writ petition No. 612 of 1974 in the Delhi High Court asking that the Government of India be restrained from promoting the appellant to the post of Industrial Adviser and that their claims to the post be considered in preference to the appellants claim. that petition was dismissed on September 17, 1975.

3. Dur


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top