JUDGMENT

GUPTA, J. :—In this appeal by special leave the only question is whether meat on hoof is taxable under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). This can be answered only after one is able to gather the meaning of that expression as used in this case.

2. The question arises on the following facts. The appellants are a firm of army contractors, registered as a dealer under the Act as also under the Central Sales Tax Act. Under the contract between them and the army authorities, they had to supply, among other things meat and meat on hoof. Under Section 6 read with Entry 18 Schedule B to the Act no tax is payable on the sale of meat, fish and eggs except when sold in tins, bottles or cartons. For the year 1965-66 the appellants were assessed on the returns filed by them, and the sale of meat to the army, whether in dressed form or as meat on hoof, was not taxed. Subsequently the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, Patiala, issued notices to the appellants seeking to reopen the assessment under Sec. 21 and impose penalty on the appellants under Sec. 10(7) of the Act. According to the Commissioner meat on hoof; was an army term for