SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 94

Y.V.CHANDRACHUD, P.N.SHINGHAL, P.K.GOSWAMI
Onkar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Administration – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Gupta, G.DAS, R.N.SACH

Judgment

Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, J.:- The appellants who are Railway employees, were convicted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi under Rules 118 and 119 of the Defence of India Rules, 1971 and were sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment. The order of conviction was upheld in appeal by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and in revision by the Delhi High Court with the difference that whereas the former upheld the sentence too, the latter has reduced it to the period already undergone. In this appeal by special leave the legality of conviction is questioned by the appellants.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the appellants are leaders of the Northern Railwaymens Union and that on May 5, 1974 they held a meeting in Tughlakabad Railway Yard inciting railway workers to go on strike from May 8. This is alleged to be in breach of the order passed by the Government India under Rule 118 (1) of the Defence of India Rules, 1971. That rule reads thus:

"118. Avoidance of strikes and locks-outs. - (1) If in the opinion of the Central Government or the State Government it is necessary or expedient so to do for securing the defence of India and civil defence, the public safety,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top