SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 124

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, P.N.BHAGWATI
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Indian Hume Pipe Company LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
K.RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, O.P.RANA, S.C.Manchanda, S.V.Gupta, S.V.VAIDYA, VINA DEVI KHANNA

Judgment

FAZL, ALI, J.:- This appeal by certificate raises a short question of law as to whether or not hume pipes which are the subject-matter of the present case amount to "sanitary fittings" as contemplated by a notification issued by the Government under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The respondent is a dealer engaged in the manufacture and supply of hume pipes. The pipes manufactured by the respondent also manufactures high quality and high pressure pipes like prestressed concrete pipes for water supply, R.C.C. pressure pipes, penstock pipes used in hydro-electric projects etc. The respondent was a supplier of pipes to various Governmental Departments both Central and State, such as Irrigation, Public Works, Local Self Government Engineering, Railways and Ministry of Petroleum etc. It appears that a dispute arose between the respondent and the Sales Tax Department with respect to the rate of tax for sale of pipes manufactured by the respondent for the assessment years 1962-63, 1963-64 and 1964-65. According to the notification issued by the Government in pursuance of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, items classed as "sanitary fittings" were to be taxed at 7% instead of 2 percent. The Sales Ta










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top