SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 92

P.K.GOSWAMI, P.N.SHINGHAL
Radha Kishan Sao – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Modi – Respondent


Advocates:
DEBI PRASAD PAL, HARBANS SINGH MARVAH, K.K.SINHA, S.K.Sinha

Judgment

GOSWAMI, J.:- This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Patna High Court in a second appeal arising out of a suit for eviction of the tenant.

2. Two rooms being shop Nos. 17 and 18 of Modi Building in Commissioners Compound, Ranchi, were let out by the plaintiff (respondents herein) on a monthly rental to the defendant (appellant herein). We will describe them as the plaintiff and the defendant. It is common ground that fair rent of Rs. 50/- per month (including water tax) was determined for the two shops by an order of the Rent Controller under Section 5 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 (briefly the Act) on May 30, 1953. Later on, certain furniture, such as five almirahs and six racks, were also let out by the plaintiff to the defendant on a monthly rental of Rs. 28/-, A suit was instituted by the plaintiff on April 18, 1966, praying for eviction of the defendant on the ground of non-payment of rent of the said two shops and furniture for three months from July to September 1965.

3. The Munsiff, Ranchi dismissed the suit holding that failure to remit rent for furniture along with rent for the two shops did not amo
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top