SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 74

A.C.GUPTA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Chand Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK GROVER, G.L.SANGHI, GIRISH CHANDRA, Y.S.Chitale

Judgment

GUPTA, J.:- This appeal on certificate of fitness turns on the meaning of the words "in respect of" occuring in Section 23 (1B) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. For a proper appreciation of the question it is necessary to refer to two other sections of the Act, Section 4 (1) and Section 23 (1) (a), before we turn to Section 23 (1B).

2. Section 4 (1) lays down :

"Except with the previous general or special permission of the Reserve Bank, no person other than an authorised dealer shall in India and no person resident in India other than an authorised dealer shall outside India, buy or otherwise acquire or borrow from, or sell or otherwise transfer or lend to, or exchange with, any person not being an authorised dealer, any foreign exchange."

Section 23 (1) (a) provides.

"If any person contravenes the provisions of section 4, Section 5, Section 9, Section 10, sub-section (2) of Section 12, Section 17, Section 18A or Section 18B or any rule, direction or order made thereunder, he shall-

(a) be liable to such penalty not exceeding three times the value of the foreign exchange in respect of which the contravention has taken place, or five thousand rupees whichever is more












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top