SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 11

H.R.KHANNA, R.S.SARKARIA
Retti Deenab And Hu / Retti Deenabandhu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.P.Gupta, G.N.Rao, P.P.Rao, S.C.AGRAWAL, T.V.S.Narasimha

Judgment

KHANNA, J.:- This appeal by special leave is against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants.

2. The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge Visakhapatnam for offences under Ss. 147, 148 and 352, I.P.C. Some of the appellants were also convicted for offences under S.5 of the Explosive Substances Act and S.25 of the Indian Arms Act. They were sentenced to various items of imprisonment and the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The total sentence of imprisonment to be undergone by some of the appellants was two years while in the case of the other appellants was one year. The appellants went up in appeal to the High Court against the judgment of the trial Court. The High Court referred to the fact that the appellants had been in custody during the course of the investigation, inquiry and trial, for about two years. The appellants were held entitled under S.428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to set off the period of detention against the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon them. The High Court in view of the above dismissed the appeal after observing that it was unnecessary to go into the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top