SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 118

JASWANT SINGH, R.S.SARKARIA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Mohini – Appellant
Versus
Virender Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

KRISHNA IYER, J.- The guardianship and custody of a child 11 years old is the subject-matter of the anxious concern of this Court in this appeal. The deepest consideration for the welfare of the child is paramount in our minds when we dispose of this appeal. We hope that the provision that we make for the further of Deepak alias Raju the minor involved in this case, will make him a bright boy and the parents, although now divorced, will have occasion to feel proud of him. We mention this so that the frayed feelings between the parties may be softened and their attitude towards their son may some day bring them together into a better relationship.

2. Counsel for the parties, Shri Ram Reddy and Shri A. K. Gupta have helped the court in producing a happy solution to this unhappy episode. The father of the respondent, we must record, also has played a useful role in bringing about a solution of the dispute about alimony.

3. The minor child Raju will be in the custody of the appellant mother who will also be the guardian of the minor. We declare so.

4. The minor Raju will be taken care of educationally and otherwise in a manner becoming of the status of the parents and of a middle





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top