SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 174

P.N.SHINGHAL, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD, P.K.GOSWAMI
Surendra Nath Jena – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent


Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, J. - Cl. 28 of the Iron and Steel (Control) Order, 1956, provides by sub-cl. (a) that the Controller may, with a view to securing compliance with the Order. "require any person to give such information in his possession in respect of stocks of iron or steel or of scrap acquired by him...."

2. It is undisputed that the appellant was acquitted in a separate proceeding of the charge that he had acquired any stocks of iron, steel or scrap. In that view of the matter, it is impossible to hold that the appellant can still be convicted under S. 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, for violation of cl. 28 (a) of the Iron and Steel (Control) Order of 1956. The High Court in our opinion, is wrong in the view which it has taken that a person can be held guilty of the violation of cl. 28 (a) even if he has not acquired the stocks of iron, steel or of scrap.

3. We, therefore, allow this appeal set aside the judgment of the High Court and acquit the appellant.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 1616

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top