SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 176

P.K.GOSWAMI, P.N.SHINGHAL, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
S. P. S. Jayam And Company – Appellant
Versus
Nehrusadan – Respondent


Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, J. :- We have compared the disputed labels and are quite surprised to find that the High Court thought that there is a "vital difference" between the two sets of labels. Far from there being any such difference, we find that in all material respects the labels are similar in lay-out and design. In any event this was hardly a matter in which the High Court. in the exercise of its revisional powers, should have interfered with the concurrent finding of fact recorded by the Courts below that there was an imminent and real possibility of deception of an unwary purchaser on account of the similarity of the labels.

2. Accordingly, we set aside the judgment of the High Court and restore that of the Sessions Judge, Madurai, dated April 26, 1972.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 1621

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top