P.K.GOSWAMI, P.N.SHINGHAL, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
S. P. S. Jayam And Company – Appellant
Versus
Nehrusadan – Respondent
Judgment
CHANDRACHUD, J. :- We have compared the disputed labels and are quite surprised to find that the High Court thought that there is a "vital difference" between the two sets of labels. Far from there being any such difference, we find that in all material respects the labels are similar in lay-out and design. In any event this was hardly a matter in which the High Court. in the exercise of its revisional powers, should have interfered with the concurrent finding of fact recorded by the Courts below that there was an imminent and real possibility of deception of an unwary purchaser on account of the similarity of the labels.
2. Accordingly, we set aside the judgment of the High Court and restore that of the Sessions Judge, Madurai, dated April 26, 1972.
Appeal allowed.
For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 1621
Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.