SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 173

A.C.GUPTA, P.S.KAILASAM
Lakshmi Chand Khajuria – Appellant
Versus
Ishroo Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
G.B.PAI, K.J.JOHN, O.P.MALHOTRA, Ravindra Narayan, S.Baggar, S.K.Bagga

Judgment

KAILASAM, J.:- This appeal is preferred by the defendant in the suit on a certificate of witness granted by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir under Art. 133 of the Constitution.

2. The respondent, Ishroo Devi, filed a suit for a decree for possession of all the three items of property mentioned in the plaint and for future mesne profits. It was alleged that the three items of property mentioned in the plaint were the self-acquired properties of one Purohit Mani Ram. He executed a will on 25th May, 1959, out of his own free will in favour of the respondent. The original will was attached to the plaint. Purohit Mani Ram died on 24th March, 1960, at Jammu and the respondent claimed to be the sole owner of the properties.

3. The first appellant is the son, the second appellant is the wife and the third appellant is the grand-daughter of Purohit Mani Ram. In the plaint it is alleged that the first appellant after the death of Purohit Mani Ram got rent deed executed in his favour and also recorded mutations in his name and dispossessed the respondent. The respondent also claimed that the three items of property were the separate properties of Purohit Mani Ram and that he was enti














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top