SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD AND P.K. GOSWAMI, JJ.
Thangiah, Appellant
Versus
The State of T.N., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 1977.
D.- 25-2-1977.
Constitution Of India,195 0 - Death - Committed murder - Appellant was sentenced to death on charge that he committed murder of his wife Kothainayaki- special leave granted to appellant to appeal against decision of Madras High Court which confirmed sentence of death imposed by Sessions Court is limited to question of sentence only- Therefore only question which this appeal involves is whether interest of justice requires that extreme penalty of law must be imposed on appellant –Held, Clear from various facts and circumstances which emerge from evidence and from affidavits which appellant was permitted to file in this Court since he was not heard on question of sentence as such by Trial Court that he committed murder grave stress of abject poverty for which he was taunted from time to time by his wife and other relatives- Considering that appellant had led a happy married life with deceased for ten years and fact that couple has three small children sentence may with some justification be reduced to imprisonment for life- Court accordingly set aside sentence of death and substitute in its place sentence of life imprisonment - Order accordingly
Judgment
CHANDRACHUD, J. - The appellant was sentenced to death on the charge that on October 21, 1975 he committed the murder of his wife, Kothainayaki. The special leave granted to the appellant to appeal against the decision of the Madras High Court, which confirmed the sentence of death imposed by the Sessions Court, is limited to the question of sentence only. Therefore, the only question which this appeal involves is whether the interest of justice requires that the extreme penalty of law must be imposed on the appellant.
2. It is clear from the various facts and circumstances which emerge from the evidence and from the affidavits which the appellant was permitted to file in this Court (since he was not heard on the question of sentence as such by the Trial Court) that he committed the murder under grave stress of abject poverty for which he was taunted from time to time by his wife and other relatives. Considering that the appellant had led a happy married life with the deceased for ten years and the fact that the couple has three small children, the sentence may with some justification be reduced to imprisonment for life. We accordingly set aside the sentence of death and substitute in its place the sentence of life imprisonment.
Order accordingly.
For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 1777
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.