SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, V.R. KRISHANA IYER AND A.C. GUPTA, JJ.
Jaspal Singh and another, Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana, Respondent.
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 34 - Commit murder - Injuries- Sessions Judge Karnal to imprisonment for life Penal Code as also of lesser offences- High Court of Punjab and Haryana having confirmed that judgment accused filed a petition for special leave in this Court- Leave has been granted only to two appellants before us- petition of other two accused was rejected by this Court incident out of which prosecution arises took place on evening of August 8 1969- cattle belonging to accused strayed into deceaseds field and that sparked off a dispute during course of which Balbir Singh received fatal injuries while two others received grievous injuries -Held, Counsel for parties it seems to us impossible to hold that appellants shared common object of two other accused to commit murder of Balbir Singh- Appellant Jaspal Singh caused one grievous injury to Fateh Shigh and two simple injuries to Jaswant Singh- Appellant Hoshiar Singh caused an injury to Balbir Singh after he had fallen down and that was an injury on Balbir Singhs finger- Hoshiar Singh also caused two simple injuries to Jaswant Singh- Considering totality of circumstances it is difficult to hold that there was any pre-concert between appellants and other two accused to kill Balbir Singh- It is necessary to add that this conclusion does not rest on mere circumstance that one of appellants did not participate in and other took a very insignificant part in assault on Balbir Singh - Orders accordingly
Judgment
CHANDRACHUD, J. - Four persons were convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Karnal to imprisonment for life under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code as also of lesser offences. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana having confirmed that judgment, the accused filed a petition for special leave in this Court. Leave has been granted only to the two appellants before us. The petition of the other two accused was rejected by this Court.
2. The incident out of which the prosecution arises took place on the evening of August 8, 1969. The cattle belonging to the accused strayed into the deceaseds field and that sparked off a dispute during the course of which Balbir Singh received fatal injuries while two others received grievous injuries.
3. Having heard counsel for the parties, it seems to us impossible to hold that the appellants shared the common object of the two other accused to commit the murder of Balbir Singh. Appellant Jaspal Singh caused one grievous injury to Fateh Shigh and two simple injuries to Jaswant Singh. Appellant Hoshiar Singh caused an injury to Balbir Singh after he had fallen down and that was an injury on Balbir Singhs finger. Hoshiar Singh also caused two simple injuries to Jaswant Singh. Considering the totality of circumstances it is difficult to hold that there was any pre-concert between the appellants and the other two accused to kill Balbir Singh. It is necessary to add that this conclusion does not rest on the mere circumstance that one of the appellants did not participate in and the other took a very insignificant part in the assault on Balbir Singh.
4. The conviction of the appellants under Section 325 Penal Code and Section 24, Cattle Trespass act must, however stand. They can each and individually be held guilty for the injuries caused by them. We, therefore, convict each of them under Section 325 and uphold the sentence to two years rigorous imprisonment imposed on them for that offence. Since they have already undergone a sentence of over 6 years, we direct that they shall be released forthwith.
Orders accordingly.
For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 1821
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.