SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 442

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, P.N.BHAGWATI, P.N.SHINGHAL
Raisul – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

P. N. BHAGWATI, J. - This is an appeal by special leave limited only to the question of sentence. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Panal Code for committing the murder of one Haji Khairati and sentenced to death. The only ground which has been urged before us for commuting the sentence of death to one of life imprisonment is that the appellant was below 18 years of age when he committed the offence and the extreme penalty of death should not, therefore, be awarded to him. The offence was committed on 13th August, 1970, and on 1st July, 1971. When the appellant was examined under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure he stated that his age was 18 years. The appellant must, therefore, clearly have been below the age of 18 years on the date when he committed the offence. It is true that the learned Sessions Judge on looking at the appellant thought that he must not be less than 24 years of age, and the High Court also, on seeing the appellant personally, took the view that the estimate of age given by the Sessions Judge was correct, but we do not think that the learned Sessions Judge as well as the High Court were right in substituting t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top