SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 141

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. RAY, C.J.I., M.H. BEG, R.S. SARKARIA, P.N. SHINGHAL AND JASWANT SINGH, JJ.
Govt. Medical Store Depot, Karnal, Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1331-1335 of 1972
D/- 26-3-1976.

Headnote:

Constitution Of India1950 - Article 131 - dispute between parties was whether Medical Store Depot of Union is a dealer within meaning of Punjab General Sales Union contended that Depot is not a dealer- State on other hand contended that Depot is a dealer within meaning of State Act High Court came to conclusion that petitions were not maintainable by reason of Article Constitution –Held, Court are of opinion that question which was raised in High Court has to be decided by High Court- Judgment of High Court is set aside- These matters are sent back to High Court to be decided in accordance with law Parties state before us that it is an old dispute and further that amount involved is large It is also desirable to point out that because of delay and largeness of amount in question High Court will dispose of matters within six months - Order accordingly

Judgment

A. N. RAY, C. J. - These appeals are by certificate from the judgment dated 18th May 1971 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

2. The dispute between the parties was whether the Medical Store Depot of the Union is a dealer within the meaning of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948. The Union contended that the Depot is not a dealer. The State on the other hand contended that the Depot is a dealer within the meaning of the State Act.

3. The High Court came to the conclusion that the petitions were not maintainable by reason of Article 131 of the Constitution.

4. Both counsel state before us that the parties never raised any question as to Article 131 in the High Court. They further state that the question in issue does not fall within Article 131 of the Constitution but would turn on the provisions of the State Act.

5. It is not necessary for us to express any opinion at this stage on Article 131.

6. We are of opinion that the question which was raised in the High Court has to be decided by the High Court. The Judgment of the High Court is set aside. These matters are sent back to the High Court to be decided in accordance with law.

7. Parties state before us that it is an old dispute and further that the amount involved is large.

8 It is also desirable to point out that because of the delay and largeness of the amount in question the High Court will dispose of the matters within six months.

9. Parties will pay and bear their own costs.

Order accordingly.

For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 2028

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top