SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 23

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. SARKARIA AND S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, JJ.
Matindu Prakash (Deceased) by L. Rs. Appellants
Versus
Bachan Singh and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 1151 of 1968,
D/- 22-1-1976.

Headnote:

Constitution Of India,1950 - Certificate of fitness - Pendency of Letters - Plaintiffs had filed a suit for declaration and which was in first instance dismissed by trial Court but on appeal judgment was reversed and suit was decreed by District Judge- Thereafter defendant went up in second appeal to High Court which was heard by a single Judge who reversed decision of District Judge and dismissed suit- plaintiffs-respondents then filed an appeal under Letters Patent before a Division Bench of High Court which reversed judgment of single Judge and decreed plaintiffs suit- Therefore defendants moved High Court for granting a certificate of fitness as value of subject-matter was or more High Court having found that value of subject-matter was not less than granted certificate of fitness- It may be mentioned here that while appeal was pending before High Court according to appellants two of appellants in Letters Patent appeal in High Court namely and Singh died respectively and despite this appellants did not take any steps to bring heirs and legal representatives of those appellants on record –Held, Court or even in this Court in their statement of case appellants have clearly averred in their statement of case in present appeal that appeal before Division Bench abated as heirs of deceased Plaintiffs-appellants before High Court had not been brought on record and respondents in their statement of case have merely taken stand that appeal does not abate as a whole-In circumstances therefore it is clear that fact that Kartar Singh and Arjan Singh died during pendency of Letters Patent Appeal before Division Bench is not disputed by respondents- question whether appeal abates as a whole so as to entail a dismissal of entire suit is a matter which can be gone into after a perusal of nature of pleadings relief granted by court and other materials on record- As High Court has not gone into this question we would allow this appeal set aside judgment of High Court (of Letters Patent Bench) and remit Letters Patent appeal to High Court to record a finding and decide whether by virtue of deceased appellants before it Letters Patent appeal abated as a whole resulting in dismissal of appeal itself or appeal had abated qua deceased appellants before it and dispose of appeal in accordance with law- There will be no order as to costs - Appeal allowed

Judgment

FAZAL ALI, J. - This is a defendants appeal by certificate granted by the Punjab and Haryana High Court by order dated the 12th July 1967. The plaintiffs had filed a suit for declaration and ejectment, which was in the first instance dismissed by the trial Court but on appeal the judgment was reversed and the suit was decreed by the District Judge. Thereafter, the defendant went up in second appeal to the High Court which was heard by a single Judge who reversed the decision of the District Judge and dismissed the suit. The plaintiffs-respondents then filed an appeal under the Letters Patent before a Division Bench of the High Court which reversed the judgment of the single Judge and decreed the plaintiffs suit. Therefore, the defendants moved the High Court for granting a certificate of fitness as the value of the subject-matter was Rs.20,000 or more. The High Court having found that the value of the subject-matter was not less than Rs.20,000 granted the certificate of fitness. It may be mentioned here that while the appeal was pending before the High Court according to the the appellants, two of the appellants in the Letters Patent appeal in the High Court, namely, Kartar Singh and Arjan Singh died on the 10th June, 1960 and 20th March, 1961, respectively, and despite this the appellants did not take any steps to bring the heirs and legal representatives of those appellants on the record. The defendants unsuccessfully tried to file a review petition before the High Court, raising this question, and ultimately they filed an application before the Division Bench of the High Court for permitting them to raise this ground in the application given before the High Court for grant of the certificate of fitness for appeal to this Court, and this prayer was allowed. The assertion by the appellants was made in the presence of the respondents who do not appear to have contested this fact either before the High Court or even in this Court in their statement of case. The appellants have clearly averred in their statement of case in the present appeal that the appeal before the Division Bench abated as the heirs of the deceased Kartar Singh and Arjan Singh (Plaintiffs-appellants before the High Court) had not been brought on the record and the respondents in their statement of case have merely taken stand that the appeal does not abate as a whole.In the circcumstances, therefore, it is clear that the fact that Kartar Singh and Arjan Singh died during the pendency of the Letters Patent Appeal before the Division Bench is not disputed by the respondents. The question whether the appeal abates as a whole so as to entail a dismissal of the entire suit is a matter which can be gone into after a perusal of the nature of the pleadings, the relief granted by the court and other materials on the record. As the High Court has not gone into this question we would allow this appeal, set aside the judgment of the High Court (of the Letters Patent Bench) and remit the Letters Patent appeal to the High Court to record a finding and decide whether by virtue of the deceased appellants before it the Letters Patent appeal abated as a whole resulting in the dismissal of the appeal itself or the appeal had abated qua the deceased appellants before it and dispose of the appeal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 2029

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top