SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.R. KHANNA AND A.C. GUPTA, JJ.
Subbaiah Ambalam, Appellant
Versus
State of T.N., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 49 of 1976,
D/- 12-2-1976.
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section, 374 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 - Sentence of death - Confirming death - Appeal by special leave by Subbaiah Ambalam against judgment of Madras High Court confirming on appeal and reference conviction of appellant under Section Court have heard learned counsel for parties and are of opinion that this is a fit case in which matter should be remanded to High Court for re-hearing of appeal and reference judgment of High Court appealed against covers less than a page- There is no discussion of evidence adduced in case and learned Judges have disposed of evidence by two sentences which read - Held, Reference Code of Criminal Procedure for confirming death sentence High Court has to consider evidence afresh and to arrive at its independent finding with regard to guilt of accused- Court are distressed to find that in judgment appealed against this salutary requirement has not been complied with and a case involving death sentence has been disposed of in a casual manner- Court therefore accept appeal set aside judgment of High Court and remand case to High Court for disposal in accordance with They swore that they saw occurrence themselves Sessions Judge has accepted their evidence and on a careful perusal of their evidence court agree with him – Order accordingly
Judgement
This is an appeal by special leave by Subbaiah Ambalam against the judgment of the Madras High Court confirming on appeal and reference the conviction of the appellant under Section 302, I. P. C. and the sentence of death.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and are of the opinion that this is a fit case in which the matter should be remanded to the High Court for re-hearing of the appeal and reference. The judgment of the High Court appealed against covers less than a page. There is no discussion of the evidence adduced in the case and the learned Judges have disposed of the evidence by two sentences which read as under :
"They swore that they saw the occurrence themselves. The learned Sessions Judge has accepted their evidence and on a careful perusal of their evidence, we agree with him."
3. It is well settled that in a Reference under S. 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for confirming death sentence, the High Court has to consider the evidence afresh and to arrive at its independent finding with regard to the guilt of the accused. We are distressed to find that in the judgment appealed against this salutary requirement has not been complied with and a case involving death sentence has been disposed of in a casual manner. We therefore, accept the appeal, set aside the judgment of the High Court and remand the case to the High Court for disposal in accordance with law.
Case remanded.
For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 2046
Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.